Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What sentence does everyone think he'll get? I think a minimum of between 30 - 40 years. Anything less would be a disgrace.
I don't think it will be anything like that much they are very very lenient in the UK not like the US which is a disgrace. Life should mean life. I think he will get maybe 20 years and serve less. He will have to go in witness protection though when he gets out because he would get street justice.
He will be out in 15.
There was so much evidence against him already that I'm assuming he changed his plea so the family didn't have to hear what other depraved and perverted things he did to Tia - not because he gave a crap, but because extra evidence would have shown him to be more sick than anyone already thought. Love his lie about 'sparing' Tia's family from any more suffering. What a joke. I think he thinks if he says something, it becomes the 'truth'.
I think it was simply to ensure no one else heard what he did.
I dont believe he cares at all about her family, just wants to protect himself inside and the evidence against him is bad enough already, without more being revealed
ITA, the less the people already inside know what he's done, the better his time inside will go for him.
ITA, the less the people already inside know what he's done, the better his time inside will go for him.
I don't buy Carlile's claim that Hazell has shown remorse by pleading guilty. It's pretty clear there was more disgusting evidence to be heard and Hazell didn't want to run that risk. He has the chance to 'clear things up' in the witness box but his defence has said he definitely won't be doing that. What can he clear up? What can he excuse? Nothing. He'd be torn to shreds in the witness box so spare me the remorseful plea. Hazell does what he thinks is best for himself. Git.BIB
I think it was simply to ensure no one else heard what he did.
I dont believe he cares at all about her family, just wants to protect himself inside and the evidence against him is bad enough already, without more being revealed
The judge, Mr Justice Nicol, adjourned sentencing to consider mitigating statements from Lord Carlile, who told the court Hazel "probably did" love Tia.
What? In what respect did Hazell 'probably' love Tia? When he was secretly filming her putting lotion on her legs? When he was in her room taking secret photos of her as she lay sleeping? When he was searching child *advertiser censored* sites for young girls committing sexual acts that looked like Tia? After he murdered her and took a sick obscene photo of her for his own sexual gratification? After he shoved her in the loft to rot? After he gave that speech about 'hand on heart, Tia walked out of my house that day?'
I honestly do not understand this Carlile at ALL. How can he make such a claim that Hazell 'probably' loved Tia in the face of the disgusting evidence her family have had to hear? That's 'probably' love?? Oh my God.