The Trustee wants to Strike Caseys Amended Objection to the Claim by the
Ambulance company [when she fell in the elevator, while in leg chains and busted her mouth].
Casey filed an Objection to the Ambulance companys CLAIM # 1, saying she should not have to pay the bill of $921.15 to the Ambulance company because she was in custody at the time, and Casey has no money [insolvent], and the State of Florida, Orange County should pay the bill.
The Ambulance company had until May 11, 2013 to file a Response to Caseys objection, but did not do so.
The Trustee says he is now in the process of closing the bankruptcy case and this unresolved Objection to the Ambulance CLAIM is hindering and delaying the
closing of the bankruptcy case.
The Trustee says Casey has no standing to object to the Ambulance CLAIM because her bankruptcy case has no money [insolvent], and
there will be no excess funds for Casey.
And, the Ambulance company did not Respond to Caseys Objection.
The Trustee says that Casey has failed to forward an Order to the Court, so he wants the Judge to file an Order striking Caseys Objection to the Ambulance CLAIM.
Motion to Strike Debtors Amended Objection to Claim No. 1 [Ambulance company]
Filed by Allan C Watkins
on behalf of Trustee Stephen L Meininger
(Entered: 05/15/2014)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpINVgyTFNiTkFvUlk/edit?usp=sharing
ullhair:. Problem is, I'm sure jbaez would have no problem producing some document, that would make this never before heard of "retainer agreement" appear legit. Voila, then run and hide behind some lame agreement they came up with once upon a time, unrelated to work product, and claim attorney client privilege was why it wasn't previously disclosed. That's just the kind of snakes they are, and it's how they've conducted themselves throughout the entire case. No doubt, it's the ONLY reason she was acquitted. And since jbaez wouldn't have been able to have a retainer fee covered under fca's indigency status, that wouldn't be an issue as far as not reporting it during one of the hearings. They're concerned with the trial fees, consultants, experts, and whatever else necessary work product fees the defense could come up with for her trial defense... As far as the bankruptcy goes, kind of the same, except everyone knows they're both lying about the retainer fee because her entire defense team, including jbaez, have said time and again she owes them NOTHING... However, I fully expect jbaez and fca would play a big time game of semantics against that argument... Doesn't mean they'd be right, but they'd play it, and whatever else they've "been advised" to do to get away with it....Regardless, I definitely think there's clear evidence of federal perjury on the bankruptcy claim, but I don't think she will be charged. I don't understand why, though...She should... That's why nobody can stand her or her team, and are sooo fed up... I hope I'm wrong, and I really hope someone else has more optimistic thoughts on this right now...Cuz, I'm telling you, if she got slapped with a federal perjury charge I wouldn't be able to contain myself, the shock would kill me dead...
