Hi otto! Looong time co-posting, eh? My confusion. He changed his shoes - and the clothes he had were never found. I go lame with repetition and assume folk will follow on. Tks for clarifying!
No. I don't think NC bought one box detergent for 7 weeks. I was thinking outside the box to extend the time line. Lets go back 7 weeks. NC buys detergent for a month (up until she and kids go on vac for 2 weeks). That's 6 weeks. BC only did his own laundry washing ... NC wouldn't have had to cover for him ... he'd at least buy his own detergent, right?
In the week after she's back (now we're @ 7 weeks - which is when a poster stated testimony effected last time detergent bought was 7 weeks earlier) the place is a disaster zone. Fuelled by her husband's uncleanliness, their moods hype up to nano-proportions on the emotional-richter-scale. NC calls her family and complains bitterly. BC slouches and does nothing.
If there was any time for him to appease NC (can't see it, tho) it would have surely been the day after NC got back once she fussed over the state of the place. But he didn't. He suddenly goes in Mr. Cleanit-Mode Saturday am where there's absolutely no sign on his wife. Why? And his car trunk only cleaned? Why? Why when he was supposed to play tennis? Then he was working. Then e was supposedly taking the kids to attractions?
Too busy a schedule and too convenient a wash (out) .... but all IMO.
Edited in: confused about the dress is also a very weak and insipid argument (not from you - from BC). Funny that. Because he clearly remembered the alleged stain on front of teal dress; he stated NC had pointed it out to him at the party. No-one else noticed this - NC told showed no-one else, either. NC/BC were not harmonious, NC dissed him at the party - not discussing stains in a chitty-chatty "ooops, look" fashion ... BC made a point of washing it and explaining clearly why to CPD. Suddenly he's "confused"? No. That's another inconsistent coincidence that's just way outta line. Too many "answers" for BC and there's nothing NC can respond with or to, sadly.
Other than a peripheral interest in this case, I started following this case at the start of the trial. I am not up to speed with all the gossip and rumor from 2008. Are you saying that the clothes that he was wearing the morning he was buying green juice were never found? Was that court testimony or rumor?
So a box of laundry detergent lasts a month in their house, Nancy went on vacation when they were out of detergent, Brad didn't buy detergent ... fast forward 3 weeks ... on the following Friday Nancy sent Brad out to buy laundry detergent at 6 in the morning. It seems she often sent him out at odd hours to buy milk and bananas, juice and detergent.
Are nano-proportions like nannerisms?
Nancy got back on the Monday or Sunday, and Brad was doing laundry and cleaning like a maniac on Friday. That could be him feeling like he's in the doghouse, and maybe he's trying to cover up a murder.
Without a timeline of when he was asked about the dress and when he talked about the dress spill, it's hard to say what he should know about the color of the dress. It's Brad's testimony that while they were at the party she told him that she spilled something on the dress, but it sounds like it wasn't noticable. No one else at the party noticed the spill on her patterned dress and he couldn't remember the color of the dress.