DNA matches in 3 locations, under nails, sides of long johns and commingled with blood in her underwear, these are indeed facts and I have provided links. Also don't take my word regarding movie lines in the RN, that info is also in my links.
Junebug99,
The touch-dna is a red-herring. Also you have failed to tell us if there is Ramsey dna on the clothing, or any other items found at the crime-scene? Never mind if the recorded touch-dna was also found
anywhere else at the crime-scene?
Why is this important? Because, like the Ramsey fibers, it would indeed corroborate claims of an intruder, sadly none has been reported leaving the Ramsey fibers standing out.
You make an
elementary mistake in reasoning to assume touch-dna discovered at the crime-scene demonstrates that an intruder killed JonBenet.
The touch-dna may have arrived on JonBenet's person during the post-mortem process, maybe it belongs Coroner Meyer, or the person who removed JonBenet's clothing for the autopsy? Maybe it was transferred from Bloomingdales pack of underwear when they were placed on JonBenet, maybe when JonBenet visited the toilet at the White's party it was transferred from the door handle, the flushing handle, wash basin handle, or side of the toilet bowl? Maybe on the way home, whilst delivering gifts, she used a toilet or handled something contaminated with the touch-dna?
There are so many maybe's and only one involves an intruder, also there is
no other corroborating forensic evidence, demonstrating that the touch-dna does indeed represent that of an intruder.
So until the touch-dna is
matched to someone and that this person is
not eliminated due to accidental environmental transfer then you have
no forensic evidence linking to any intruder at all!
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Mr. Ramsey, it is our belief, based on forensic testing that there are hairs that are associated -- that the source is the collared black shirt that you sent to us that are found in your daughter's underpants, and I want to refute...
J. RAMSEY: Bull (EXPLETIVE DELETED). I don't believe that. I don't buy it. If you're trying to disgrace my relationship with my daughter...
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Mr. Ramsey, I'm not trying to...
If you return and read your own post you might notice that similar to Patsy's interview
no explanation is offered for the forensic evidence discovered at the crime-scene. Just lots of righteous indignation and bluster.
The one place where forensic evidence should
not be found, linking a Ramsey to the crime-scene, is on JonBenet's genital area, beneath her size-12 underwear.
Why are you so concerned with the touch dna which you say has three site depositions, yet completely disregard far more numerous fiber site depositions, does that tell us something about your bias or intellectual capacity, or both?
.