If there was a hunter in that photo, he'd have to be at least 30-40 yds. away for his face to be that much smaller than Madyson's. Heck, that little square is so small I couldn't make anything out by enlarging it. It just blurrs.
Comparing the length of the pine needles to the length of Madyson's face, that is a longleaf pine. Does it seem odd to anyone that the pine has what appear to be fully developed needles and they are that close to the ground?
If the picture's been photoshopped, then it never came from a cell phone. Now I'm really scratching my head. What would necessitate such a lie? Or was it just misinformation that the pic came from the cell phone? This is really going to bug me now.
Oriah, when you do that search, take along a copy of the Madyson photo, and see if you can find that rock. Then try to take a photo of the rock and flora from the same angle as the Madyson photo. Although it will be later in the year than when the Jamesons disappeared, we should be able to see if the types of trees match up to what's in the picture. The pine should have its leaves, and maybe there will still be a few leaves on the deciduous trees, the sweet gums or whatever those trees are that were in the background. I still can't figure out what kind of tree would have purplish leaves and be found growing wild in SW OK. That little horizontal tree looks like a Japanese plum to me, and I know they don't grow wild in Oklahoma. Maybe it really isn't purplish, but just shows up that way on my computer.
