MenloveGardens
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2021
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 3
"Of further and insane importance, one book claims the "running man" TOOK EBERLE (sp? I haven't read it in a while) TO THE BODY."
Who was "Eberle?" and what is meant by "To the Body?" Needs clarification. It sounds like some of the book quotes mentioned above are confusing. What evidence there is, shows that Betsey was attacked from behind, It was so quick that she couldn't even scream.
Satch
Sorry I checked, it's Erdely. It's been many months since I read anything on this case.
Here is one:
"A stranger emerged from the Core, coming at Erdely and Uafinda like a speeding train. He looked to be about twenty-five years old, about six feet tall, and big, but not husky. He had one of those professional faces one tends to associate with foreign correspondents on television. He was better dressed than the typical student, wearing a sport jacket over khaki work pants. Allen, who of course had never seen the young man before, thought he was wearing a white shirt and tie.11 Neither Erdely nor Uafinda recognized him either. When the running man saw the two students, he slowed but did not stop. “Somebody had better help that girl!” he said, gesturing back toward the noise. But he was not going to help her. The stranger continued moving toward the stairs, but then saw Allen, who was still standing well apart from Uafinda and Erdely. The running man whirled and headed back in the opposite direction, but on a route that took him around, not through, the Core."
The other book:
"This would prove interesting, because it explained some of his behavior at Wright’s house on the night of the murder – a potential attempt to gain an ally and stave off suspicion when the headlines about the murder broke. It also fit with the man who, after stabbing Betsy Aardsma through the heart, would stop to tell a bystander that “That girl needs help,” leading her to the body before finally making his escape."
If I recall also the autopsy was very clear the stab was to the front. One of the books had the report. Again I am sure I would need to search them etc. and fact check myself.
But it essentially feels like a pointless endeavour to some degree, to back and forth over minor points when if the statements etc. had actually been replicated we might legitimately be able to resolve the case. Haefner was interrogated, why is his statement not written out in books on the case? Was it corroborated?