He was something- he up and died 3 days later. How ridiculous.JG just mentioned that RM3 wasn't terminal the day Jeannie was speaking with AM, but he was terminal the next day!
He just pointed out another lie by AM.
He lied because he's a lying liar who lies, and always has.He told you why he lied....**big pause**...no I'll tell you why he lied
I understood the judge to say that the discussions were not too deep, paraphrasing, but that she did discuss her opinion on his innocence or guilt. It could be that the defense is behind this, if they are and it is found out, that would be a major violation that I would think end their careers . MooI really wonder what the nature of the discussions were. Did the people she talked to know she was on the jury? It didn't sound like the judge was being too harsh almost the opposite.. weather intentional or unintentional.. still thanking her for her service on the jury. If one person emailed the judge, then the juror was questioned and she provided names to them of possible people then it sounds like maybe what she didn't she didn't think was wrong. They come in and the judge said they waffled in what they said happened. It makes me wonder if the defense was behind some ply trying to get jurors to talk even a little in some way. I know everything isn't their fault, but what if they were trying to get a read on the jury's thinking to this point and it back fired because the people she talked to told.
Iirc he used to be a prosecutor, is he getting confused.?
Blessed break.
I really wonder what the nature of the discussions were. Did the people she talked to know she was on the jury? It didn't sound like the judge was being too harsh almost the opposite.. weather intentional or unintentional.. still thanking her for her service on the jury. If one person emailed the judge, then the juror was questioned and she provided names to them of possible people then it sounds like maybe what she didn't she didn't think was wrong. They come in and the judge said they waffled in what they said happened. It makes me wonder if the defense was behind some ply trying to get jurors to talk even a little in some way. I know everything isn't their fault, but what if they were trying to get a read on the jury's thinking to this point and it back fired because the people she talked to told.