- Joined
- Apr 17, 2009
- Messages
- 503
- Reaction score
- 1,136
She was said to have tattoos but I don't see any on any of her pics.
Ashley Arason
Canada's Missing | Case details
www.services.rcmp-grc.gc.ca
View attachment 556458Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.www.instagram.com
Wait, whose pics? I'm seeing tats on the left outer wrist, left outer forearm and center of back...amazingly all covered or not in view in the black and white photo. The inside of left ankle could be a tat showing through wet and clinging see-through leggings...but could also be an imprint of the heel of her right foot. Some people stand like that at rest. Whatever it is seems too defined to be a dirt smudge, but who knows. I'd say the slope/definition between the upper knee/bottom front thigh is similar.She was said to have tattoos but I don't see any on any of her pics
Now that I'm looking more closely at b/w photo, it looks to me like her leggings were only totally wet up to about 3" above her knee at that point, most visible on the left leg. Which is only relevant in that she didn't go through waist-high water close to that particular time-stamp. My biggest takeaway is these are women with similar bleaching and length of hair, body type, and potentially posture who (speculation) are not adverse to crossing water whether by necessity or not. As for being barefoot, the person in the pink bikini likely had the choice, and the person in the b/w possibly didn't.