Yes, just like the killer -- he was brazen enough to show his face, etc. Their are a lot of burglaries and robberies with video of the people not wearing any type of mask.
One thing I wanted to mention: the company I work for used to hire this cleaning crew to clean our building. We had this crew for the majority of time I was at the company. Many of my co-workers would discover their earbuds stolen from their desks; some had small personal items taken from unlocked cube drawers. I'm sure some people reported it, but it was never really followed up -- there's not much HR can do if the crew simply denies it. Then one day a co-worker left his car overnight in the parking lot, and when we arrived at work the next morning, the car was on cinder blocks and the tires were missing. When my company expanded to a second office in the area almost a year later, yet another car was on cinder blocks in the second-office's parking lot -- which was proof enough that our cleaning crew was involved. Finally, that was enough for my company to fire the cleaning crew; and it was discovered that, one of the crew members had actually been using our delivery van to commit other crimes around the area.
My point is, this made me think about the LB killer. He must have had at least some familiarity with the area -- just like my company's cleaning crew. None of them were from the immediate area, they were from the city. And simply because the killer was driving a black suv, doesn't mean it belonged to the killer -- or that is was even, technically, "stolen" at the time. He could have simply had easy access to it. Obvious points, but nevertheless.
Different ways the killer could be connected to the area (add if you have more):
Delivery driver (Fed-Ex, UPS, etc.)
Construction worker (for that particular strip mall)
Cleaning crew of a nearby office/establishment
Security (of a nearby establishment)
