I'm wondering what it is going to take to solve this case. It seems like for over 20 years I've heard LE has the truck bed cover and there is a speck of blood so small that testing it for Patti's DNA would consume the entire stain. I believe there is a cat hair found on it that matched Patti's cat. So if tomorrow LE can test it w/o consuming all of it AND it turns out to be Patti's what do we have? A spot of blood that might have come from cut so small Patti might not even have been aware of it? And it isn't like the truck upholstery because it is removable so Patti could have come in contact with it while it was folded up in the cab sometime prior to that day. Plus in a no body case they usually need evidence that the volume of blood found is such that the victim would have been seriously injured or dead. And they don't have that here.
Don't get me wrong, I strongly believe this co-worker is responsible. I just wonder what else LE found in their searches because I can't believe this case hinges on testing that spot of blood. A witness? The location or use of the missing loan from Patti? Maybe the guy had an accomplice who knows something and they need him to talk? After 20+ years its past time for a resolution.
Don't get me wrong, I strongly believe this co-worker is responsible. I just wonder what else LE found in their searches because I can't believe this case hinges on testing that spot of blood. A witness? The location or use of the missing loan from Patti? Maybe the guy had an accomplice who knows something and they need him to talk? After 20+ years its past time for a resolution.