photographer4
On Time Out
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 4,674
- Reaction score
- 26,438
Well, that’s a scary looking guy there. Those vacant eyes looking so full of anger.
Well, that’s a scary looking guy there. Those vacant eyes looking so full of anger.
So when the trial happens, I’m just wondering if the State will still opt to hold back any evidence or if they’ll throw everything at this guy? Asking because if they still suspect others may have been involved, are we likely to hear about it or are they going to pretend they never made the suggestion when RA was arrested and at other times before then?
For somebody sitting in jail he changes his appearance more than I do![]()
If not absolutely all, I want to know what the heck happened and they’ve got the right man. I don’t want to be left with a lot of Whiskey Tango Foxtrots.So when the trial happens, I’m just wondering if the State will still opt to hold back any evidence or if they’ll throw everything at this guy? Asking because if they still suspect others may have been involved, are we likely to hear about it or are they going to pretend they never made the suggestion when RA was arrested and at other times before then?
Deer in the headlights!Well, that’s a scary looking guy there. Those vacant eyes looking so full of anger.
And no one in Delphi said "Hmmm. White man, right build, height working at CVS, worth a look.Well, that’s a scary looking guy there. Those vacant eyes looking so full of anger.
I assume they will only introduce evidence that can be proven, and is, of course, admissible. I will be disappointed if they don’t explain the suspicion of others involved. I especially want to understand the suspected motive. Hearing why there were two sketches would be an added bonus.So when the trial happens, I’m just wondering if the State will still opt to hold back any evidence or if they’ll throw everything at this guy? Asking because if they still suspect others may have been involved, are we likely to hear about it or are they going to pretend they never made the suggestion when RA was arrested and at other times before then?
Same here! I want to fully understand what happened here. Make it make sense!If not absolutely all, I want to know what the heck happened and they’ve got the right man. I don’t want to be left with a lot of Whiskey Tango Foxtrots.
We had someone in Le ages ago tell us he thought he had heard the Down the hill voice before and couldn’t place it. Can he place it now?And no one in Delphi said "Hmmm. White man, right build, height working at CVS, worth a look.
It was the Sheriff Leazenby.We had someone in Le ages ago tell us he thought he had heard the Down the hill voice before and couldn’t place it. Can he place it now?
Well, that’s a scary looking guy there. Those vacant eyes looking so full of anger.
Angela Ganote Fox 59Has anyone seen who/what outlet/reporter has announced they'll be in Allen court tomorrow feeding the news timely?
This has been discussed before, I forget the exact explanation but CSAM is only CSAM when the person holding it or distributing it would be doing it for sexual gratification, which is very strange as it would seem impossible to tell either way.So why then was Mw charged with misdemeanour theft and not possession or distrib of CSAM?? This has never made sense to me.