Didn't we have testimony, yesterday, of literal car plastic embedded with JO's clothing?I'm assuming you've watched the trial to date? And you think the jury is gong to convict her on that "EVIDENCE"?
Really?
Didn't we have testimony, yesterday, of literal car plastic embedded with JO's clothing?I'm assuming you've watched the trial to date? And you think the jury is gong to convict her on that "EVIDENCE"?
Really?
Can you link to the documents from the FBI that state that? I haven't seen them.
Can you link to the documents from the FBI that state that? I haven't seen them.
No, not that I recall. Who said it?Didn't we have testimony, yesterday, of literal car plastic embedded with JO's clothing?
Didn't we have testimony, yesterday, of literal car plastic embedded with JO's clothing?
here is a video from the hearingCan you link to the documents from the FBI that state that? I haven't seen them.
RBBMI am still considering that the FBI determined that the injuries were not consistent with being hit by a car.
medical examiner wrote ‘the death was not the result of a fight’ on the death certificate. That is the opposite of what a death cert should do! It does not say what did not cause the death.
The evidence gathering team ‘were not given the green light’ .
Vallier?No, not that I recall. Who said it?
Vallier?
It's possible you missed it with Lally fumbling around with papers for minutes at a time, but it's pretty damning evidence.
It's possible I missed it a mention to it. But I watched all of her testimony and if she said it, there was no discussion of it. Which pieces of clothing and where on the clothing? How were the pieces collected? How tightly were they embedded in the fabric? And of course, there's been no cross yet.Vallier?
It's possible you missed it with Lally fumbling around with papers for minutes at a time, but it's pretty damning evidence.
RBBM
It is extremely odd to write such a thing, as if the ME were 'instructed' to include this.
John O'Keefe didn't drown either, but the ME doesn't say that.
Why declare it was not a fight?
It's possible I missed it a mention to it. But I watched all of her testimony and if she said it, there was no discussion of it. Which pieces of clothing and where on the clothing? How were the pieces collected? How tightly were they embedded in the fabric? And of course, there's been no cross yet.
Hardly damning if it was just one brief mention that didn't even make it into any of the trial recaps in the MSM.
According to Post #305 from yesterday, the hair was not even human. Not expecting DNA confirmation that it was JO's hair.If it had a root, as was implied yesterday, I'm assuming the prosecution was able to get a DNA profile? I missed the last hour or so of testimony because Lally finally put me to sleep.
I know it took forever for the prosecution to get the hair to the lab and to get it back from the lab, but I don't think even this prosecutor would introduce the hair unless they have an expert who is going to testify that it's John's.
Looking at the clothing though, it's hard to imagine a solo piece of hair being the only genetic material on the SUV that allegedly killed a human being. There was a ton of blood that must have come from the head wound. And I'm sure the defense will point out that the SUV was regularly housed in John's garage.
Karen Read trial: 3 from State Police testify about physical evidence collected
Three Massachusetts State Police witnesses testified Monday about the physical evidence in the case.www.boston.com
You're saying it's not damning, but you're also uninformed about the testimony that is taking place. The entire trial is also being live streamed and available to be re-watched on YouTube.
There's absolutely no need to be rude just because you disagree with someone's opinion. We all know the trial is available on YouTube, and as I mentioned in my post I did watch Vallier's testimony.Karen Read trial: 3 from State Police testify about physical evidence collected
Three Massachusetts State Police witnesses testified Monday about the physical evidence in the case.www.boston.com
You're saying it's not damning, but you're also uninformed about the testimony that is taking place. The entire trial is also being live streamed and available to be re-watched on YouTube.
According to Post #305 from yesterday, the hair was not even human. Not expecting DNA confirmation that it was JO's hair.
Thank you. You're very kind.I'd say ch_13 is one of the more informed posters. They are here daily and I'm sure they know where to watch the trial.
What's not damning is pretty much the CW's entire case, so far.Karen Read trial: 3 from State Police testify about physical evidence collected
Three Massachusetts State Police witnesses testified Monday about the physical evidence in the case.www.boston.com
You're saying it's not damning, but you're also uninformed about the testimony that is taking place. The entire trial is also being live streamed and available to be re-watched on YouTube.
RBBMThat was from months ago. Which is why I addressed how long it took to have the hair processed. It almost didn't get admitted by the judge because the prosecution still didn't have DNA results back at the eve of trial.
I don't see much point in the prosecution saying it's been confirmed as O'Keefe's hair if it hasn't. Lally isn't quite that dumb. But we'll see soon enough what they're claiming.