I was just listening to the Generation Why podcast about Amy. In the podcast, they said it’s been all but proven the Jas is not Amy. Jas worked with a well-known *advertiser censored* movie maker. No names were given. They also said there are additional photos of Jas on the internet that show her dancing in a club. They said from these full body photos it’s even more clear that Jas is not Amy.
Does anyone know where these additional photos of Jas are?
Ugh!! I hate this so much. This is why no one can trust any podcasts. I have a small hobbyist YouTube channel (not advertising it here), and I do a lot of digging into where "facts" about cases have actually come from and talk about it in my videos sometimes. The research takes forever, and is why my channel will never be profitable. I'm deeply skeptical of any podcast or channel that gets too many pieces out too fast. There's no way they're doing proper research.I've listened to that podcast episode. The podcast hosts state that they got that ''information'' from an anonymous post on the internet... And then irresponsibly passed it off as an investigative fact. Another example of how quickly disinformation can disseminate in discussions regarding unsolved cases.
**UPDATE**, I googled "image enhancer" and look what happened. It took less than 2 minutes to get the same "new Amy" from the "Old Amy" photo.
So I can 100% say that this photo is NOT new. I can say that it's the same image from AAV someone just used a website like Upload Image to Sharpen & Upscale it - Cutout.Pro and it gave me the EXACT SAME RESOLUTION as the "New Amy" photo.
So nothing new on the photo.. I will say IMO it looks more like a 40-45 year old woman and not a 20something..
UPDATE 2: Here's the other Photo. It looks like New Tech/AI can do amazing upscaling. I don't believe it's Amy whatsoever.
No, it's about this supposed "new information" that we still haven't heard about after a month.is that what all the recent activity has been about? the 'enhanced' photos?
not seeing much of a difference in the 'enhanced' photos
so not her IMO
different eyebrows, different eyes, nose looks different but hard to tell with different angle
Thanks for reposting the "photo comparison info" Jezel. The shape of the jawline gives me chills. It's very distinctive. I find the photos haunting.No, it's about this supposed "new information" that we still haven't heard about after a month.
Here is the photo comparison info from that same site if you're interested.
LadyL,is that what all the recent activity has been about? the 'enhanced' photos?
not seeing much of a difference in the 'enhanced' photos
so not her IMO
different eyebrows, different eyes, nose looks different but hard to tell with different angles
My (not perfect) transcription of that part of the video about the escort pics that look like Amy:5:00 mark on time stamp - the Bradleys discuss the forensic artist…
No, it's about this supposed "new information" that we still haven't heard about after a month.
Here is the photo comparison info from that same site if you're interested.
Alright, y’all, I’ve got something it might be worthwhile to track down.
Awhile back I mentioned a podcast put out by Longwood University’s alumni affairs, and 2 episodes in 2018 were about Amy’s case and featured interviews with Brad and FBI agent Erin Sheridan (she was responsible for getting Amy’s poster back on the FBI’s site.)
Anyway, the dang thing has disappeared from the internet, based on my attempts at finding it again.
Here’s proof it existed, althought none of the sites that show it actually seem to have the audio (this screenshot was taken tonight, from the castbox app. Appears to be there, but downloading fails and it doesn’t play.)
Anybody got any ideas?
View attachment 509902