I mean, I'm convinced.Sure, very believable
I was thinking I was seeing a new meaning of "brotherhood."Is there a mandate that says most of these cops have to be bald? Is it part of their uniform? To me it seems like it's right out of the Intimidation Playbook.
I wonder if those shaved-heads dudes actually consider themselves bald?They probably have to be bald, liars and hate women.
I wonder if those shaved-heads dudes actually consider themselves bald?
Do they have another term for that smooth headed "macho" (cough) look?
Thats the thing !! If you don't look for it - you don't find it !!!This is my whole point. Proctor says there was no evidence for anyone else but he’s the one who controls the evidence.
I was actually very thankful when Judge said end at 4. He brought his own sharp scissors.Do we REALLY need to go over ALL of this stuff again??
right, i understand and agree. but WHY did they want to hurt JOK? i know what the defense is offering but i just desire a little more knowledge (we’ll probably never get) on the details of their discord. all i’m 99.9% certain of his KR did not kill JOK
Considering everyone involved was drunk, I suspect there's never going to be a straightforward, logical answer to this. Whatever happened, it was done in a haze of booze and I doubt any of the parties involved could explain what actually happened and why, even if they wanted to.
I've been in a bar where a couple of guys were horsing around and play-fighting just like the two Brians were. Then one hits the other a little too hard, the second guy retaliates, and suddenly they were in a knock-down, drag-out fight for real. If they hadn't been separated and chucked out, one could have very well killed the other.
Apologies as I'm not current in the testimony, but I feel like Proctor had a "tell" for his lying. In normal circumstances, he says "no," but then on certain items he would say "absolutely not." Those were the ones where it seemed he was lying IMO. And he said "absolutely not" a lot.