RBBMBut the problem with all of that is the alternative/ defence is the idea that this all happened to frame karen read.
RSBM for focus
No way could they get so much to align...and... who is 'they' anyway??
Hiding behind big man on campus Procter .
That man isn't smart enough to keep lewd jokes off his work phone.
Way too much credit given to this idea.
Im shocked it is the defence and people buy it.
moo
But for the jury, the problem you envisage is not their problem. Jmo
If the jury deliberate the way they are supposed to, by considering the evidence and applying that to reason, then I don't think there is actually a problem. Or the problem you are envisaging isn't one the jury needs to struggle with. This is not a problem the jury is required to resolve. Nor should it be. Moo
The evidence simplified:
(1) On the one hand you have evidence that JO did not receive injuries in any way consistent with the cw's contention. On top of that you have injuries that have been reasonably shown to be attributable to the teeth and claws of an animal and that animal is most likely to have been a dog. On top of that, JO's body lacked even the minimal injuroes any reasonable person would expect to see from being hit by a car. There is no significant bruising to speak of.
(2) On the other hand you have tail light pieces at the scene.
The evidence presented under (1) above is not open to manipulation. It is simply sound scientific evidence which the cw was unable to counter. You cannot plant bruises on a dead body. You cannot manipulate animal bite and claw injuries to make them look as if they were caused in some other way.
In contrast, the evidence presnted by the cw at (2) above was open to manipulation during the course of the investigation. The defense's exposure of the shoddy investigation shows that it is not beyond the realm of possibilty that the evidence could have been tampered with, could have been contaminated (in the case of JO's shirt). Moo
But the jury itself does not have to figure out how the tail light pieces discovered in February 2022 ended up on the lawn of 34 Fairview. Neither does the jury have to figure out how it was that JO was killed and ended up at the location he was found. That was the job of the cw and they failed at that task imo.
Another way of putting it is the jury do not have to believe in a 'conspiracy' to come to the reasonable conclusion that KR could not have murdered JO by hitting him with her lexus. moo
It will be up to a future investigation to figure out these things in the event that the jury does it duty and brings back the correct verdict of NG based on the evidence. Moo