AugustWest
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
- Messages
- 694
- Reaction score
- 8,111
I believe that @PrairieWind is saying that restraint is not relevant because Texas' kidnapping statute (like most other states) makes a provision that "restraint" is non-consensual by "(B) any means, including acquiescence of the victim, if:I believe the charges will come. I also believe she initially went with them willingly because they said something to make her feel safe like “ let’s get you home safe”. I think by the time she became terrified, it was too late. She trusted them enough not to create a scene at the store and to walk away with them. That is not her fault. It is theirs. In my opinion, the bite and scratch marks are solid evidence, but am assuming creepo explained those away somehow. I don’t think her being bound is irrelevant. ( my opinion only). Kidnapping is specific. Strangulation may not constitute a kidnapping charge in the eyes of the law. Once again. Strictly my opinion. However, I have faith in the evidence. These two men need to pay the ultimate price for their evil acts.
(i) the victim is a child who is less than 14 years of age or an incompetent person and the parent, guardian, or person or institution acting in loco parentis has not acquiesced in the movement or confinement." Restraint is thus implied.
Texas Kidnapping Statute
See: PENAL CODE CHAPTER 20. KIDNAPPING, UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT, ANDSMUGGLING OF PERSONS
Texas Romeo and Juliet Statute:
See: PENAL CODE CHAPTER 21. SEXUAL OFFENSES
Last edited: