Being assigned to the DA’s Office as an investigator is considered a premium assignment. He has been transferred out of that assignment and relieved of duty. He will probably be reassigned to one of the MSP barracks on paper. I’m not fully versed on MSP bargaining agreements so the following would be the course of action against Proctor based on general guidelines. He has likely been relieved of his badge and his gun pending his internal affairs hearing. In most cases you would be suspended with pay until your first hearing. You would have your union rep with you at the hearing. Internal affairs will set the hearing date and you will be called in to face the charges pending against you. (By charges I am not necessarily talking about legal charges, but they may be in the mix.). Depending on the outcome, you may be suspended for a period of time with or without pay. (I would guess without pay in this case.) You may be assigned to desk duty for a period of time. You could be fired, and you could be put down on criminal charges.
I am thinking he may be suspended without pay until the federal investigation is complete. In the meantime, he has his own agency’s internal affairs investigation to contend with.
No wonder he kicked that reporter off his lawn today.
I suspect we are going to see a lot of interdepartmental and inter agency bickering going on. No one likes to look bad but it’s a thousand times worse if you look bad on a national stage.I think it is perfect CW shot off it's mouth saying how they were going to re-prosecute, and moments later it is announced that Michael Proctor the lead investigator for the CW has been relieved of duty because of serious misconduct that emerged in testimony at the trial!
Hahahahahaha!!!!
Unless they can risk paying her attorney fees and court costs they'd be ill-advised to try it any time soon. And probably won't as long as there's a pending criminal retrial. And KR's reportedly broke. If the retry is abandoned, or the FBI moves on others - then I'd say the odds go waaaaay down.Has there been any talk of the O'K family filing a civil lawsuit? I wonder if they've looked into filing a wrongful death civil lawsuit.
They could. However, there is a federal investigation still going on.Has there been any talk of the O'K family filing a civil lawsuit? I wonder if they've looked into filing a wrongful death civil lawsuit.
Wouldn't there be a lot of evidence allowed in a civil case that the judge didn't allow in the criminal trial? I frankly think DY and AJ would have a field day in a civil trial if so. And yes, they would risk being liable for her legal fees if she prevails, and that would sting a lot.Unless they can risk paying her attorney fees and court costs they'd be ill-advised to try it any time soon. And probably won't as long as there's a pending criminal retrial. And KR's reportedly broke. If the retry is abandoned, or the FBI moves on others - then I'd say the odds go waaaaay down.
All IMO.
"It's terrible ... it's completely unprofessional. It does harm, frankly, to the dignity and the integrity of the work of men and women across the State Police and law enforcement. So as a former attorney general and as governor, I am disgusted by that," Healey told reporters Thursday afternoon when asked about Proctor's texts."
Healey: Trooper's ‘terrible' behavior in Karen Read case harms law enforcement
The testimony this week of a lead State Police investigator in the Karen Read murder case was “terrible” and tarnishes the integrity of law enforcement, Gov. Maura Healey said Thursday while also declining to weigh in further on the closely-watched trial. Read is accused of backing her car into...www.nbcboston.com
This gives me the chills for all jurors in all trials. Of course people on both sides have seen them. They are not 100% anonymous. In all cases there may be people who resent your decision. Even if unanimous. Somehow they need protection.
True.Actions speak louder than words.
Ah, yes, that’s what the law says…do what your heart of hearts tells you, even when it is completely against all the evidence you’ve been shown.I am pleased though the jurors went hung.
Stuck to whatever they believe in their heart of hearts.
It is not right when one or 2 (whatever number) are pushed into a verdict they do not support.
No matter which side you sit on.
I respect their stance.
Its so important.
No matter the cost.
Whether she gets tried again or not.
Each juror stood their ground on what they believe to be true.
That is fair and righteous
moo
They’d be better off suing Lexus. For making a magical SUV that can kill a man without leaving a mark.Has there been any talk of the O'K family filing a civil lawsuit? I wonder if they've looked into filing a wrongful death civil lawsuit.
How would they collect from someone with no money if she used it all to defend herself?Has there been any talk of the O'K family filing a civil lawsuit? I wonder if they've looked into filing a wrongful death civil lawsuit.
Imagine being a convicted person in a previous case he handled and wondering how he influenced the outcome! He's the whack job! MOO."It's terrible ... it's completely unprofessional. It does harm, frankly, to the dignity and the integrity of the work of men and women across the State Police and law enforcement. So as a former attorney general and as governor, I am disgusted by that," Healey told reporters Thursday afternoon when asked about Proctor's texts."
Healey: Trooper's ‘terrible' behavior in Karen Read case harms law enforcement
The testimony this week of a lead State Police investigator in the Karen Read murder case was “terrible” and tarnishes the integrity of law enforcement, Gov. Maura Healey said Thursday while also declining to weigh in further on the closely-watched trial. Read is accused of backing her car into...www.nbcboston.com
Yes, I didn't hear the honourable judge charge jury with instructions along those lines that's for sure.Ah, yes, that’s what the law says…do what your heart of hearts tells you, even when it is completely against all the evidence you’ve been shown.
I really like that Jackson chose to use misogynist and corrupt in tandem; Overall, the two most accurate (qualifier *non expletive) adjectives to describe Proctor's conduct, behaviour and attitudes as revealed in this trial. Jmo
“Regarding Trooper Michael Proctor being relieved of duty, conduct has consequences. DA Morrissey backed this misogynist corrupt cop, and 2 hours after he announced he will pursue a second trial against an innocent woman Karen Read, The Massachusetts State Police announced that Michael Proctor the lead investigator for the Commonwealth has been relieved of duty ‘because of serious misconduct that emerged in testimony at the trial’. We look forward to another opportunity to reveal the truth about this unjust prosecution. Good Luck.”
And, “good luck.” lol.1. He didn't just say misogynist. He also said "corrupt."
2. He also said they look forward to another opportunity to reveal the truth about this unjust prosecution.
Bam!!!!