a high school student committing 4 murders at one time is absolutely insane to me. i wonder if there was another person, but from what we know police are only looking for one suspect correct?
This is what I am wondering about.
I always thought that the perpetrator:
1) either had a potential target
2) or, confused the houses
3) or maybe, it was out of rage but somehow, he needed to know/observe the family
What if the situation indeed includes two people?
I don't know about the base, I think it is a red herring because this information has appeared recently, but what if there indeed were two people:
- one watched the house or the inhabitants, or, like
@Sor Juana mentioned, all you need is to have minimal information about the inhabitants' habits
Or, there is a lot of information one can get from the park if one merges in with the observers, and really, really, doesn't stand out at all? A mom with kids, or an old guy, anyone.
To get into the house, one has to be slim and lithe and fit
To kill the inhabitants, rather trained (or having the habits of the killer - maybe he enjoys it?)
But what really surprises me is as if the goals differ:
1) - to kill four people. That's our typical case, a SK, a sadist, a torturer... whoever. Half of our traits are about this case
2) the second part is about searching for something. That something is small and has value. It is difficult to trace.
I don't know what it could be. An family heirloom - an award from WWII times? Can be sold on any Axis forum. Or, a piece of jewelry. A jade bracelet now costs a premium, for example. Or, good Japanese pearls? Or, even an old sketch of a Japanese master?
I honestly don't know how and where the TMPD lifted the fingerprints, but I wonder if they, too, could be planted intentionally? The DNA is probably real, because at that time, the murderer could not know the future value of the DNA. The "whorls" might have no value.
I wonder if there was a second person, a "spotter" or a "tipster" that provided the information. The killing was really, to leave no traces.
Why didn't he repeat the murders? Well, perhaps there is no sense in it because they became better at stealing? Nowadays, there is more information online.
I wonder what exactly was taken or what did the pattern of search hinted at? Maybe it is in someone's collection now? Also, what expensive Japanese trinkets could be sold on Ebay soon after?