SMK777
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
- Messages
- 6,191
- Reaction score
- 53,061
Very important observations, thanks!I have been wondering if perhaps this is a stalker type case and the idea to try to harm the family and traumatize one of the parents might have been the motive for the visit. Trauma was a research focus no?
Not sure we will ever know, so much comes down to inner thoughts and emotional state. Perhaps some sort of electronic forensics could shed light on the genesis of plans for the visit. Am curious if she attended their wedding the prior year, were they social friends even at that level? JMOOO.
I think the surviving baby may have emotional trauma from loss of twin and from injuries at a non-verbal age. There may even be lasting physical/sexual/emotional harm that continues from the injury itself. JMOOO. All so tragic.
I suspect she will take a plea but given the nature of the injuries to 1st baby and rage to both, have to wonder if she experienced physical and sexual abuse as a child herself. Not in any way an excuse but perhaps recreating trauma unconsciously. The violence toward both babies is so extreme and sad, directed toward genitals and the head. So vulnerable. JMOO.
Calculated and controlled harm to first, assuming she did it, and rage toward the second. For someone who values intellect, even if the 2nd baby had not died, he could have been grievously and permanently brain injured. modship - suspect's family members are off limits, as always> MOOO.
ETA: In terms of a “stalker” case, do you mean premeditated babysitting and harm?
Last edited by a moderator: