SMK777
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
- Messages
- 5,881
- Reaction score
- 50,529
It looks like they were concerned with liability issues re 2 murderers at the school, and potential harm. Warding off litigation looks to be their sole focus in the statement. And yes, it lacks sensitivity, certainly.I thought the same thing when I first read it, too. Their emphasis was on making sure THEIR good name wasn't smeared in anyway. Really inappropriate. Their PR person needs some sensitivity training. JMO IMO