Search results

She claims to have joined Al-Anon. I would presume she learned there that consuming alcohol in front of a recovering addict threatens their sobriety. Par for the course for Ms. Heard of saying one thing and her actions prove otherwise. His sobriety was of a lower priority than her consumption of...

That makes sense now that you mentioned it. She puts it up when something is on their screen. Who would she be hiding it from, the court camera? I assumed the photo is on all screens throughout the courtroom, no?

I noticed the attorney sitting to the right of JD is oddly holding a yellow legal pad up. Is this to prevent the photographer from taking photos of whatever JD is writing/drawing? It seems like an odd way to sit.

One of the talking heads on Law and Crime network opined that during the off week one or both sides may attempt to settle the case. I am not sure if I agree, but it's a possibility I suppose.

I agree completely. Unfortunately, you can wrap a pile of poo in gilded paper and it still just is a pile of poo.

Question regarding objections here... I typically follow criminal trials and not so many civil. I am suprised at the talking objections being allowed from EB. I find her to be disrespectful to the judge with the way she is argumentative about the objection even before the judge has a chance to...

"after the engagement but before the engagement" So with time on earth being relatively linear, what time-frame would this fall in to? This one statement is a fantastic representation of AH's testimony. Logically impossible. ETA: now I am confused or my brain just can't process her words...

AH states she had minimal interactions with her personal assistant (Kate James)?? Whaa? A personal assitant lives at the hip of their employer! She then states her personal assistant drank on the job? Um, why didn't you terminate said employee Ms. Heard?? What on earth? The jurors can't possibly...

Her performance gives me Nomi Malone from Showgirls vibe.

Thank you!

Thank you. I was thinking I had missed something with the way she wording it, makes it sound like he admitted to it in writing. So it is just more of the same fabrication from her side to take advantage of his ambiguous style of writing. Got it. :rolleyes:

Are ALL these alleged texts from Johnny that she is referring to of him apologizing for hitting her in evidence?

AH: " I worked with deaf kids" I believe hearing impared is the correct term. Her description is offensive. o_O

My internet has been wonky today as well and I am having intermittent issues with this site also. Not sure if that helps you or not..lol

I am confused by this. At the end of court yesterday copies of Dr. H's notes were to be made for both sides of council. So what happened to EB's copy and why didn't she review it?

Dr. H administered the CAPS 5 test the end of December 2021 which I believe was after Dr. C administered it earlier in the month. If that is so, it makes me wonder Dr. H's motives for administering the test since she did not deem it necessary between Sept. 2019, when she first evaluated AH up...

I thought the same since, if I recall correctly, there was testimony that AH never leaves the bathroom in the AM without makeup on.

BBM I also am curious to know the dates for when Dr. H performed these evaluations. I agree with you that the narriative she is delivering is very general. It feels more like "if/than" statements that offer the implication of abuse based on AH's story and not rooted in anything that can be...

BBM. What I understand is, that AH was the only one evaluated since her counter suit includes that her mental health was altered by the alleged abuse. JD's suit was based on defamation, so his mental state is not under scrutiny and was not evaluated. So this witness' testimony is based solely on...

I am thinking James Franco.