Search results

The should have borrowed a page out of the US Military's playbook when they drove Manuel Noriega out of the embassy in 1989 by blasting heavy metal music for days. I think this song blasted day and night up and down the Nelson would have done the trick...

.

Yeah well, I think that can be questionable given now the RCMP have admitted their personal effect and clothing were lying on the shore, for "several days" near where they should have been expected to be, and only found them because of a civilian tip! Not sure if that qualifies for "great work".

Because if you try to apply Occam's Razor in the case, it certainly does not lead to the mainstream narrative!

So the BIG question that this autopsy report raises is, if they were dead for "several days" before they were found, how did the RCMP not find their clothing or personal items on the shore near where the RCMP should have suspected them to be all along?

Would be much like the RCMP firing squad on the back of the old $50 buck bill:

I think that's quite a stretch. All two guns point to is that they both wanted to have a gun for whatever reason....safety, robbery, OR, perhaps killing. All I'm saying is it does not just point to "wanting to kill others"

Was wondering the same.

Well then in that case you are making the assumption they were hand guns, which, while not impossible, would be much less likely taken from the KM family gun rack. More than likely the KM family had long guns, though that's really only speculation. I'm only suggesting that the odds would be in...

while I for the most part agree, I think one other consideration would make an exception to that line of thinking. In rural areas, long guns are protection from wild animals...(eg. grizzlies). If they felt they would be spending time sleeping/camping in the woods on their sojourn, they could...

Rapids in rivers are extremely loud, and they were between two big sets of rapids. Not to mention, that if they were .22 rifles, they don't make much more than a little pop.

If long guns then I still wonder how they hell they could hide those in the roadside check. You can't put them under a seat, and chances are they were not hidden in advance to evade detection in a search, since they were not expecting that at all.

no way you would hear shots that far away, even up in the wilderness.

Yes. of course...thanks for setting me straight. I really thought it was the same person doing all three autopsies!

Must be same coroner/medical examiner who did Epstein.

As you said, the investigation is still ongoing, so until such time as it is done, they are only suspects/accused. I would think so long as the RCMP had a code of not announcing cause of death to protect the victims dignity, they would ensure first through their investigation that BS and KM...

question for anyone...which direction were Deese and Fowler traveling on the Alaska highway leading up to their murders? What was their previous known stop/destination before then? thanks to whoever can answer.

Then what about the dignity of BS and KM? RCMP are probably going to tell us how they died tomorrow, aren't they?

Every day on the news I hear, "man stabbed to death", "woman shot to death", "teen gunned down in daylight shooting", "woman beaten to death with bat", etc etc etc. I guess in all those cases the police said f&%k it to the victim's dignity? Why all of a sudden is this one person's dignity so...

Canadian family law is heavily weighted toward the mother. Very few men get majority-time custody. Chances are if he was living with his dad, HE (BS) most likely made the decision.