Search results

But if the defense has the letter, they can't just invent what the letter said. That's why I said, maybe he changed his mind after beginning of May 2023. This is what the memo says: On May 1, 2023, the State of Indiana, by way of Prosecutor Nick McCleland, received a letter from former...

I'm pretty sure they learn in law school that they are not allowed to lie to the court. And not just learn, but get that hammered into their brains. I doubt they would make that mistake because of pride, fatigue or anything else. And if they actually did, then they deserve to be disbarred and I...

Um, what? The murders happened at the crime scene, so if there is no DNA there, where do you think DNA would be that actually links him or anybody else to the murders?

Maybe not several, but one person. I mean, if we look at the sketches ...

So you think they would totally risk that for Richard Allen? Why? If they are willing to do that they must think he is a million % innocent.

But the defense is not just talking about if he was physically able to do it alone but if he was able to do it alone in a bit over an hour or even less. And now that we know what the crime scene looked like, I'm wondering that myself. I think it's weird, especially after this memo (and let's...

Yeah, that short statement didn't tell me a lot. He didn't say that they lied. And the letter they are talking about in the memo, they have it, like I said above, they are not allowed to lie to the court, they could and probably would be disbarred for that. The only question is if Click changed...

The bolded part - where does it say they lied? Defense lawyers can't just lie to the court, they can be disbarred for lying to the court, you think they'd risk that for Richard Allen?

I didn't say they left anything out, I just said we don't know. And no, they can't just lie in the memo, so I'm sure Holeman said that, but yes, they can leave things out. They can interpret things like the crime scene (wonder if they talked to an expert?), that wouldn't be lying either.

You should read the memo, several LE testified in depositions.

Don't think they can lie about what somebody said in a deposition. The only question is if and what they might have left out.

From the memo: Jerry Holeman has testified to the following: There is no DNA linking Richard Allen to the crime scene.187 No data extracted from Richard Allen’s phone connects him to the murders.188 No data extracted from Libby’s phone connected Richard the murders.189 There is no evidence that...

I'm a couple of pages behind, don't know if somebody already replied. I checked again and you are right, it says "one of the mothers". I think I just heard a lot of people say that it must have been Abby's mother because we know about Libby's mother, but I think I mixed things up in my head...

My thoughts are that I don't know what happened and if he acted alone, but that he probably did it, maybe with others involved (either in the crime or before or after like KK with the Anthony Shots account). The felony discussion is not about me thinking he didn't do it or is not involved, my...

Ok, looking at it again, this is not about felony murder, it's about murder as it says in the title: "2022 Indiana Code Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure Article 42. Offenses Against the Person Chapter 1. Homicide 35-42-1-1. Murder"

We have been through this a million times at this point, examples were posted, felony murder doesn't automatically mean that the person charged with it killed someone. I saw a video from a lawyer a few days ago as well on that subject, he talks about this case in the video, that RA is charged...

I didn't say you didn't post examples, I was just saying to be charged and convicted of felony murder, you don't have to kill anyone and "see the examples", lol. I really don't care what they charge him with as long as it can be proven in court that he did it and/or was involved. And if that's...

The bolded part. If someone is charged with felony murder, they didn't have to kill anyone, see the many examples that have been posted above. And yes, again, makes me wonder what evidence they have or don't have, seems like there is no DNA for example, no fingerprints, etc. And also makes me...

Lori Daybell ... Insane things do happen. Staging/posing does happen as well. If the prosecution had actual evidence that something like this happened (and I mean in general, not in this case), then I hope people wouldn't scream "satanic panic" and let the perps walk free ...

Well, I mean, we know from other cases though that cults can do insane things because they have insane beliefs.