Search results

do we have video on the 17:17 time stamp? or just a still? not for the coming, but for the going? Additional photos may help too if anybody has one besides the one in the 4 shot. TIA:seeya:

I think i'm getting it now... at least a little better http://news.yahoo.com/michelle-parker-missing-moms-fiance-domestic-battery-conviction-160513996.html Here is one bit I found about the dinner, it said they had planned on having an oyster dinner... quote: Launer said that nothing seemed...

now i see where i may have gotten the 7pm dinner plan idea from. it was probably from your timeline. thankx:seeya:

the s. orange/w. sandlake location is where the phone actually was when michelle's brother called to ask where she was when the reply was Waterford. That was at 4:26pm 11/17 and that is why LE said the location that was indicated by text and the place that actually pinged did not match...

I am still looking for where I seen the time, but this tells a lil sumthin about the dinner in the meantime: http://news.yahoo.com/michelle-parker-missing-moms-fiance-domestic-battery-conviction-160513996.html Here is one bit I found about the dinner, it said they had planned on having an...

Also on texaslil's map, it says 4:25 white van pulls in Makes U-Turn and Parks. The only reason I am pointing this out, because we have been told it wasn't dale's, but what is interesting, is what time it arrives, verses michelle's phone indicating she was somewhere else BEFORE that time, but...

her shift started at 7:30pm 11/17 and she was usually 10 to 15 mins early. Yes, her plans were to go home and nap then a dinner date, then work, as far as we know.

yes it is!

It is this video that lets you see the drivers side of the white van... i knew I had seen it somewhere, and there is no logo for the company on it.

good catch! and yes you are right! it IS missing now!

i got the location off of texaslil's map. I trust since that location has not been removed, it is accurate.

:blushing: and you DID point that out too, didn't you :floorlaugh: It is very important IMO yes i'd give it an A:twocents:

:twocents: I would say HIGH if you mean 'other than what was captured on video" If all he knows is what he saw from what he recorded, then it is low, because LE already has that evidence.

I was also wondering if everyone who has texting capabilities, and an I4 phone, would do an experiment for me... using smart text, where the phone suggests possibilities, would you please begin typing that in, and at every letter, after the first 3, would you list your results, per letter...

I'll trade ya what's in my box for your curtain number 2:fence:

agreed on the color factor with sun. I watched it coming in and it went dark gray, therefore, i agree it could be hers going both directions... as for the hot lava orange vehicle, a close up reveals it is a scion. The owner/driver, being one and the same, has been identified. What would...

usually, all you gotta do is add IMO or MOO, unless it mentions a new name...:seeya:

:floorlaugh:

all i know is that it was noted by someone as a quick bite to eat at 7pm... but I can not remember where i found that... on a side note, if michelle was known to arrive 10 mins early for her shifts, and IF the meal really was planned for 7pm, and you would need some drive time, unless that...

Thank you for saying what i have been thinking all along... whatever happened to michelle, didn't happen in whole, or possibly, just remotely, may not have happened at all, at that condo... either way it went down, she was still breathing until she got to wherever it is she will be...