Search results

In order to believe the Ramsey's are innocent, I have to believe an intruder got into the house, this intruder takes JonBenet from her bedroom to the basement without waking anyone up or leaving any trace, doesn't abduct her once he's got her back to the basement, but abuses and kills her there...

Well, she had a problem controlling her bodily functions so she could have had an accident and she had vaginal problems so she might have complained of being in pain. I would think it would have been a female teacher, not a male one, but who knows. I don't see how unidentified DNA cancel out...

They just came out with those and I thought it was pretty universally acknowledged that the reason is that modern parents can't deal with the stress of potty training their children, so the age of potty training is getting older and older. But, JonBenet wasn't unpotty trained, she was a...

I'm pretty sure I remember that almost everyone at John's company was investigated, along with every person the Ramsey's fingered as the possible killer...and no evidence turned up. For all anyone knows the panties and tights had been previously worn by her, they were thrown somewhere in her...

I thought it was proven that it was written on a pad from the Ramsey home, that there were previous 'attempts' at the note in the waste basket and that it was written from a pencil that also came from the home.

The pediatric panel that reviewed her autopsy agreed that the vaginal trauma was evidence of chronic abuse. I know I did not dream that. The repated visits to her own pediatrician for vaginal problems I also did not dream.

The Ramseys are loving parents with no motive for killing their child and no history of criminal or abusive behavior. -No motive for purposely killing a child, yes there is evidence of long term sexual abuse and no normal 8 year old is a bed wetter unless there is something wrong, some...

I don't see those cases as being similar. This "intruder" got into the house, got JonBenet in her room, took her downstairs, abused her and killed her including garroting her and the paintbrush, then goes back upstairs, sits down, does a couple dry runs with the ransom note, writes the ransom...

I don't believe this exonerates the Ramseys. The unknown DNA profile has been known about since 97, all this does is say that the same DNA that was known about before is also in other places and its NOT semen. Good grief, it could be from some teacher, nurse, anybody. It doens't account for...

That's what I thought and I agree, Mary Lacy wants to close the case especially after the Karr debacle. Unless a perpetrator is caught I will never believe a stranger broke into the house leaving no evivdence of the break in, murdered JonBenet, then spent a few minutes writing and rewriting...

Maybe I'm not understanding that, but wouldn't that mean the DNA could have come from any investigator or technician who ever handled the evidence?

Yeah, there I agree with you...if she really said these things, I'd think most young guys would think they hit the proverbial jackpot. But I strongly disagree that this is common behavior..sex talk to that degree...among 14 year olds or even high school students.

Not buying it. Only HALF of 18 year olds have had sex. I do not believe that kind of sex talk is anything but totally uncommon for a 14 year old.

That's what I thought. Everyone already knew the DNA was unknown. Still doens't explain the rest of the crime scene.

If I had to guess, I would guess that AR was probably promiscuious, Jacques seems to encourage this and it totally fits with the profile of many child sexual abuse victims who see their only 'value' and means of 'control' in using sex. But, we don't know if she really said this to Juvenile 2...

There is too much we don't know. We don't know if AR knew what Jacques wanted Juvenile 2's semen for. We don't know if Juvenile 2 knew or suspected of AR's relationship with Jacques. We don't know if Juvenile 2 was at the Jacques house, waiting outside, as AR says in her statment or...

That's what I think...delusions of gradeuer. A freaking google search could have told him that his fake messages would be detected if the police ever put a computer forensic specialist on it. His entire retarded plan was predicated on him, a sex offender, never being suspected and everything...

In that case I totally agree. I love it when judges really go off on these criminals and give them a lecture about their lies. In fact, it seems like too few judges speak their mind at sentencing. These guys are all the same, though you know? Reiser, Mark Jensen, I'm sure in Scotts' mind...

Here are my possible motives/theories. 1. Jacques ability to control AR gave him a false belief he could control Brooke...his plan was to hold her hostage for a few days [or longer] in the belief he could cow her into submission, as he had done AR. Her death was an accident. 2. Jacques...

No, once its dry its virtually impossible to know when it was deposited.