Search results

God knows where it is located in the threads, but I remember reading it. Don't have time to search for it right now, but I'll try to do it later.

From what the VIs have said, Accion America distanced themselves from him once they realized he had lied to them.

Ah OK, that makes sense.

I am sooo anxious to learn what forensics reveal! It's been 8 weeks...

Just read the remainder of the last thread's posts to catch up, and saw mention of using dogs to search for Christina. I never did understand why LE said, a few days after she went missing, that too much time had passed in a heavy traffic area for dogs to be helpful. Ok, but would it have hurt...

Very well said, Hibiscus. I was thinking something very similar, but didn't have the energy to try to express it, so thank you!

Just read that there's been an arrest in Paige Birgfeld's case -- the guy who LE investigated back when she went missing 7 years ago. Her body was found 2 years ago, yet he is only now being arrested. Yet another case that tells me the lack of an arrest of the RSO, whom cops have investigated in...

Make that 3.

True. I think all the wondering & worrying was getting to us -- humor is always how I deal.

:dead:

It's really not odd at all, IMO. LE makes that statement in almost every missing person case unless or until they get a solid lead.

I believe the VIs have stated that they aren't free to share how they know this.

Maybe Fox will have breaking news?

Brittany Feagans said on Twitter that her interview with Nancy Grace was cut short, due to HLN's focus on Bill Cosby. She said the part about Christina will be very short and not that informative. :/ https://twitter.com/BF_StarNews/status/535553510386200576

Do you know if it will be the 6:00 news?

LMAO Yeeaaahh, her little proclamation of journalistic ethics is looking more and more suspect.

Thank you, Bessie, for explaining. I get confused about the rules sometimes, so this is very helpful (helps to have it explained using a current case, in addition to the general rules).

I don't feel I have anything to add at this point, but want to thank you for doing due diligence for Jaimee. It seems he's the only one that circumstantial (& maybe hard evidence too, who knows what LE found or are in process of having tested) evidence seems to pointing to, so I don't know how...

Yeah, I don't follow her reporting, so I don't know if she holds that standard with all of her stories, or just this one. If it's just this one, I definitely would look askance at using journalistic ethics as a pretense.

It does seem like a few things have been shared with reporters that LE then tried to snatch back with carefully worded statements, which could be interpreted any number of ways.