Search results

No. They won't say "in custody" in relation to a crime victim. There is another suspect, or POI, that hasn't been named yet.

THANK YOU!!!! for having the balls to post this. I still see people defending their analysis of their original suspicions. I said it before, it's perfectly normal to be suspicious of the statistically most likely suspect, but making persuasive arguments using pure speculation about "catch...

There's a difference between suspecting the usual suspects, vs. a second-by-second analysis of the 'suspect's' media interview to make a case for his likely involvement. Not saying you're guilty of the latter, but big picture, if MF (or anyone else) had murdered mom and baby in their own...

And yet here's a guy with very similar circumstances that didn't do it intentionally. http://www.fox16.com/news/local-news/judge-naramore-charged-in-hot-car-death http://www.arkansasmatters.com/news/local-news/new-info-in-ar-hot-car-death-case In fact, if "drove the car with a dead child in it"...

That's fine that you don't want to buy it but please understand that I'm not expressing an opinion. I'm using facts presented at the trial to rebut your opinions that appear to be based on gut feelings. I'm also not clear why you're bringing up the jury's findings of guilt in a thread titled...

Jurys get it wrong. http://www.innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/

There is no evidence he looked in the car. There is no evidence there was a smell when he went to the car at lunch. In fact, the coroner testified that there could have been no smell of "death" since decomposition doesn't happen until several hours after death. There was a big deal made about...

So you believe he's guilty because he did things that day that he would have done any other day? And for the record, I'm not convinced this was a horrible accident. Just that he's not guilty of malice/felony murder beyond a reasonable doubt. I think people don't realize there is a difference.

What did he do to cover up his guilt? All of the experts testified there was no evidence that he tried to erase anything from his phone or computers. This seems to be true, considering the swath of a smut trail he left behind him. The most damning thing I can come up in terms of 'cover up'...

Thanks for sharing. I too had a situation where my wife and I were sometimes switching cars and my older daughter would sometimes watch my younger son. One day my wife assumed my daughter was watching my son and I assumed my wife knew I had him with me when I switched cars with her that day...

Nope. 9 times out of 10 I toss it right in just like Ross did. If I'm getting in my car, I will hold whatever is in my hand until I get in the car and then put it on the seat. That's if it's something small, like a pack of light bulbs, for example. If it's too large to hold while I get in, I'll...

Is this a serious question?

I throw things in from the driver's side all the time. I go to that door first out of habit. It also helps to ensure that I don't forget to take out whatever it is that I'm putting in the car. If I'm running several errands and grab something that I will later need at home, 9 times out of 10 I...

Boring told jurors lots of things. Many of them weren't true. If we just assume something because Boring said so, we don't need jury trials. Or courts or judges.

Was the life insurance policy made known to the jury?

The crux of this case is a.) what a 6'3" Harris could see while sitting in the drivers seat facing forward and turning to the right to grab his brief case; and b.) what a 6'3" Harris could see at 1pm on June 18 in the Treehouse parking lot as he walked up to the closed driver's door. Jurors of...