Search results

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #2

    no she was not, she was dating a young man from Sarnia.
  2. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #2

    its possible the victims parents were split, hence the two last names. I do recall seeing more than 1 family in her profile photos.
  3. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #2

    MM was not NP's boyfriends brother, her boyfriend was a good well liked guy, if you want to keep referring to him in these posts you mights as well use the short form of "CB", im sure the family is upset CB had let her leave that party, but there was no way to know this would all unfold this way.
  4. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #2

    This isn't true, don't believe everything you read.
  5. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    I gave a fairly decent description back on page 45-46 or so on what I knew so far.
  6. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    I believe it was stated she was seen Tuesday morning at her home by a neighbor who had questioned her about her injuries.
  7. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #2

    I believe it was stated she was seen Tuesday morning at her home by a neighbor who had questioned her about her injuries.
  8. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    Her garbage was put out late Tuesday night or wendsday morning for garabge day. She was a RPN with health care experience, it would have been severe for her to seek treatment you would think.
  9. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #2

    Her garbage was put out late Tuesday night or wendsday morning for garabge day. She was a RPN with health care experience, it would have been severe for her to seek treatment you would think.
  10. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    Its very possible this is true I was out of town all day and haven't even had a chance to look at a newspaper since I've been home.
  11. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #2

    Its very possible this is true I was out of town all day and haven't even had a chance to look at a newspaper since I've been home.
  12. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    Correct, but again London is so close to sarnia, imo this cant be considered enough evidence if you want to link MM to any cases in London. its much too common for people to move/travel/visit/commute to work between Sarnia and London.
  13. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    You are totally correct, im new here and forget this is web sleuths so speculation and coincidence are things to be considered and debated here, Myself I was trying to keep my posts as factual as I can with the information I have. Sorry to be rude like I was.
  14. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    that would be sketchy.. the chance for a random inspection at US customs is pretty high.
  15. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    i have no idea? what would that have to do with the case? I have already stated TB went to London to seek medical treatment for her injuries. its possible MM also did the same, or possible the TB took MM for his wounds and not her own.. Anything after that is hear say as far as I know unless...
  16. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    correct AC only led them to the body.
  17. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    18 or so for her and her fiance who was with her when she took the photo. i beleive this was stated on facebook.
  18. S

    GUILTY Canada - Noelle Paquette, 27, Sarnia, Ont, 31 Dec 2012 - #1

    Neither of these two owned a vehicle even remotely close to the one in your description at any time in the last few years. I do how ever have an uncle with a car matching your description.. Do you think it was him possibly? see what im saying.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
1,681
Total visitors
1,765

Forum statistics

Threads
600,064
Messages
18,103,242
Members
230,982
Latest member
mconnectseo
Back
Top