Search results

I believe there was a welfare check for Gabby..to see if she was there. That's when they handed LE the card for LE to contact their lawyer if they have questions. I don't know if they even told le that Gabby wasn't there, but if they thought that she was, they wouldn't have hauled her van...

I said I believe so... If there is a dispute about that, ok.jmo

dbl dbm

The van was towed late at night, but I believe their initial effort to talk to the L's and Brian was earlier in the day. Daylight. When they were handed SB's card. jmo

SB is not Cassies lawyer, and I don't think she had retained one at that time, so all I can think is that the L's asked her not to talk or ask questions about Gabby's absence, because it would upset poor little Brian. The first time Cassie spoke, she seemed to think there was "some...

I suspect that they did, at least somewhat, which is why they chose to be silent, IMO MOO JMO

If they would like to sue someone for defamation, that's their prerogative. Discovery would be interesting. Both sides would have to answer questions under oath. jmo

dbm

Maybe the most enjoyable part of her trip....socially, at least. jmo

OK. So, alone but online and may have had a visitor. jmo

With whom do you speculate she may have been? jmo

???????

I think they are not concerned about ID....he was ID"d by dental records. The issue is Cause of death. DNA isn't going to reveal that. I hope that they have enough skull parts to assemble to rule in or out death by gunshot. jmo (And, who knows? Maybe they found a gun.) Even if they did...

We don't know what really transpired with either of them from Aug 13 to Aug 24. She was alone in SLC (from 17th to 23rd) while he was supposedly home moving their stuff out of storage to his parents house and according to Cassie he was helping his father do that? (Not, his father helping him.)...

It's not about reporting. It was a curious situation and we have no idea what story B told them about his sudden appearance home. But, even if they missed the cues that something wasn't quite right, they then refused to respond to G's very concerned parents. That is not criminal behavior, but...

We do know that the L's CHOSE to not contact G's family when their son returned to FLA without her. Their friend/legal advisor may or may not have advised them not to talk at that time. It was not an order, however. They chose. jmo

I personally don't know if they are in any legal jeopardy, so I can't assert that they are not. I have questions, and so far, no answers. JMO

Their son and their strange silence have brought on all of the speculation about their involvement in this case. And their Attorney has made it worse. This happens. jmo

<modsnip: Quoted post was removed> But they are paying in other ways because he plopped this mess on them. Not exactly respectful of his dear old parents' right to live in peace and comfort. jmo

I think that is just assumed, because they likely wouldn't have been able to do it in a condo parking lot, so presumably they worked on at his parents home. But they worked on it for quite a while. Neighbors occasionally saw them doing that at Wabasso. jmo