That's been my concern as well. We're getting so far into the weeds with the psychological back and forth that it may confuse a juror. Hopefully, there won't be one who — if they don't completely buy BPD — thinks they should vote not guilty on M1. It's becoming a larger issue than it...
Qs for this guy: How many autopsies have you performed? How many brain sections have you taken during an autopsy? What caliber bullets were fired in your cases and from what range? What caliber bullet was used to shoot TA and from what range? Would a period of decomposition reduce the ability to...
Yes. The jurors are to return at 9:30 tomorrow for a short day. Then no court until next Wednesday. She said the jurors will stay there Wed. until the case is done, even if it's past normal quitting time.
Next Thursday, she will instruct the jury, and then the attorneys will begin closing...
Nurmi asks if a shelf were dislodged, whether it could have simply been put back in place. So is he seriously suggesting that perhaps JA dislodged the shelf and took the time to put it (and its contents) back neatly in place, but left all the other mess in the house? And if so, wouldn't that...
I don't know how much clearer it could be that JA became nothing more than a booty call to TA, a means of indulging in some sexual fantasies. Beyond that, he had no use for her once he had her number. She didn't like it, stalked him, premeditatedly killed him and concocted one grand lie after...
So, I happened upon a set of wireless headphones on clearance a couple weeks ago and ordered them. They weren't for listening to this case, but I hooked them up today and have been able to make spaghetti sauce, do some cleaning, go all over the house and even out on the deck without missing...
At the very least, the jury is gonna know by the line of questioning and multiple objections that there is something bad and very stalker-ish that the defense doesn't want in.
I expect to see more of this as the trial winds down. Even if it prompts an objection and has to be withdrawn, it's a way for the jury to hear what you want them to hear.
Slipping it in via an answer by a witness makes it seem more legitimate to the jury. But DeMarte is keenly aware of what...
He objects when he actually needs to, when it's a significant issue. I think it's actually better to hold off on the objections when possible when you have a witness as capable as DeMarte is of handling it on her own. Much more effective for her to shut JW down than for JM to do it through...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.