Search results

I haven't been following much, but he could've asked her to come over when she got back so that he could console her after her grandma's funeral. Meeting at the park could've been as simple as, "My house is kind of difficult to find... Just meet me at the park." Also, maybe she just wanted sex...

I'm not so sure. However, I think there's probably a stronger case against her than there was for AT, if that's possible.

Oh, (d) definitely fits, and none of those mitigating circumstances apply, unless they say that BB made him do it.

Anyone know what these aggravating condition factors are?

I think that would be a great outcome for everyone. The family doesn't need to sit through that again and BB knows she's not going to get away with it.

Ok, that's one... on to BB!!!

YEAH!!!

I'm not sure how it could matter. One person held her down and the other strangled her? They both actively killed her. ETA - That would be like if two people were stabbing someone and you argued, "But we don't know who made the fatal stab."

I think it's funny that in one of AT's letters to BB, he said, "They say you're good at computers and phones. I told them this is the hi-tech age. Everyone is." I'm actually pretty convinced they're both really bad with technology. 1) They apparently didn't think LE could track them via Tinder...

Funny how AT says he cut her up with a hacksaw, but NOT the one he had just purchased and that has now mysteriously vanished. Seriously...

I'm almost positive that's exactly what he was going for. I don't think it will work though.

I think it's when he said that he was in it for the money, but BB was in it for the sex. I guess that could sound like it was BB's idea. I don't know, I also didn't get the impression that he said anything to throw her any more under the bus than she already is. If he did, I'm sure he didn't do...

“You don’t like him and I don’t like him but he’s still presumed innocent,” Murray said. HAHAHA, coming from his own lawyer. Seriously, kudos to Trail's lawyer. What a terrible person to have to try to defend. Sydney Loofe's death was no accident, but 'a premeditated murder gone right,'...

I know yesterday she was a defense witness. ETA - It doesn't sound like the defense called anyone this morning or that Trail was on the stand again.

I don't think they selected her to be BB's kill. I think they selected her to be AG's kill. I think they used it as a way to hold more power over her. He told AH she could leave the cult at any time until she killed someone. I also think that BB got off on it. I also think they made a video...

Exactly what I thought... he's trying to fake remorse. It was probably BB who asked if she'd be ok, not SL.

They can have cameras. There have been several videos from the trial. They just couldn't record the 3 witchnesses.

Is his plan now to just make random claims to confuse the jury?

Not only roasting pans, but also meat grinders and a thermometer. I wonder what type of thermometer it was.

I'm assuming there's no surveillance or anything like that from the hotel? Just someone being "sure" of something they saw several months prior? Couldn't the prosecution track Sydney's phone and prove she was elsewhere just to squash that rumor?