As ive said before, both lawyered up. Their lawyers would have told them to say nothing. You dont lawyer up, then talk. Nothing sinister about it. That's their right in Australia.
They have both lawyered up. It seems obvious to me that each lawyer would tell their client not to say another word. Especially without their lawyer present. Otherwise why lawyer up, then not heed their advice. It's their right not to speak. Nothing sinister about it.
It seems to me that without actually finding Gus, the police dont quite have enough to lay charges. It would help everyone if the accused fessed up now and Gus was found. Moo.
That is what happens if you dont plead guilty. You have to go to trial where dirty laundry is shared. Sure will be interesting who among his family or friends will be in court to show their support for him. Innocent until proven guilty, though.
So does this mean that searchers simple discard their gloves as rubbish in the area? That would be totally unacceptable for professional searchers in Australia.
Yes, police have done a great job of the search. I wonder if the extensive search was done, and abduction ruled out to leave just one last theory. Something happened to Gus by someone known to him. I suspect police thought this theory high on the list from the start.
Wonder what makes them...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.