Search results

You have to listen to the above podcast that just came out. This man has been with Fred and working the case with the family for 11 years. So much I didn't know. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

https://youtu.be/zhW5kWVfjgE Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

You're making a lot of assumptions. That's all I can say. Obvious misconduct on the prosecution side (Avery). I don't believe he will get a new trial either unless enough bad publicity comes towards Wisconsin AND (as his lawyer mentioned) they develop another new technique that can help...

Right, I mean he could be a "victim of the system" and have psychological issues from being in jail for 18 years, or perhaps he was just a criminal to begin with. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

The point of a juror is to decide if someone was proved beyond a reasonable doubt, not necessarily who might have done it instead or if the accused IS actually guilty. There are many cases where a jury finds someone not guilty and a juror will say later that he believed deep down the accused was...

I don't believe they were completely biased at all. It's worth a go. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Wow, the jury started off seven innocent. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Sgt. Colborn just rubs me the wrong way. His body language when on the stand was odd. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

That article made me LOL. I thought the same thing about that horrible ID drawing done in the rape case. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I totally understand that, but can you imagine if someone else killed her and is walking free right now? They never found her blood or DNA or anything even consistent with her being tied or raped or stabbed in his house. Not a drop of blood, nothing. That is bizarre to me. Sent from my Nexus 5X...

I think they meant her blood was not found in his house, his garage, anywhere. They stated that they think he stabbed her in his bedroom, but no blood was found on his mattress, carpet, anywhere. None of her DNA was found on his property. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Have you seen how large the salvage yard was? I think they said it was four acres. And the car was found at the edge, furthest away from their trailers. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Oh, it seems Brendan was Steven's alibi in the beginning, and that's why the family thinks they went after Brendan. If you watch the confession/interrogation of Brendan, it is interesting. They had a confession expert go over his interrogation. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

So, they have the restraints in evidence? I can't find that. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I feel like this case should have been handled completely different. It was mishandled so badly. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

It's just bizarre to me. He had just spent 18 years in prison and was going for a million dollar payout. He said he was wary of Manitowoc County coming after him. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Hard to say. Maybe when they started talking to him, they found a weakness in him and just kept going. They interviewed everyone in the family. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I mean, Manitowoc County Sheriffs Dept was not supposed to be on that crime screen, whatsoever. And here we find out they were on scene for several days. They also hid him from his lawyer the first day they arrested him. This case is a mess, just like the first one. Sent from my Nexus 5X...

He was 16, low IQ, and said he said what he thought he was supposed to say. 'Mr. Avery’s nephew Brendan Dassey, goaded into a confession by highly questionable tactics (which we see on tape), tells his mother that he was “guessing” what the interrogators wanted. “That’s what I do with my...

My throat hurts from yelling at my TV. I do not believe Avery murdered this woman. They found the Rav 4 keys in his room. Guess who found it? Oh, why it was Lt Luenk and Sgt Colburn, the two officers who were involved in his original conviction. They are the ones who sat on a call from Brown...