Search results

It must be Monday. I meant unequivocally.

Do you have links disabled in your browser?

Your inability to "hear one thing that points to their guilt" isn't our problem - it's yours. Your not comprehending the cumulative evidence that convicted these child killers doesn't mean it doesn't exist - it just means you, for whatever reason, aren't understanding it, or you're being...

I don't need to hide behind anything. The WM3 are twice convicted child murderers and will remain so until they die. "The conviction was based on nothing, except the need by a community to make it go away." It's easy to just make stuff up and put it on the internet. This is a baseless and...

They weren't accused - they were convicted. You do not understand the Alford Plea.

Learn what an Alford Plea is before you scoff at facts.

You mean the one that put them behind bars, and the one that caused them to plead guilty and admit they'd be convicted again with another trial - based on said case?

You are missing a very simple and crucial component of criminal justice: if a criminal pleads guilty to a crime, the State will not "pursue another trial". I'll leave it to you to figure out why that might be. Oh, back to what this thread is actually about - where's that exculpatory evidence we...

Your logic may be ever so slightly flawed. If the defense for the WM3 (or ANY defense team for that matter) knew a standing conviction would be "overturned", why would they possibly have their clients plead GUILTY and not instead have the conviction overturned? By the way - you totally made that...

The fact that you keep mentioning Douglas as your "ah-ha! See, they're innocent!" moment says a lot. The "state's case was overturned"? "Echols filed a petition, which was not granted, but then the decision was overturned by the Arkansas Supreme Court." Is that what you're referring to? The...

Frankly I'm shocked he was so brazen as to present such an over the top ridiculous conclusion.

I don't use caffeine. Nobody said you have to respond to anything. "Refused to try them again"? No, that's absolutely incorrect. See Userid's post above. And on the contrary, the WM3 offering to plead guilty and taking the Alford Plea mean specifically that they are admitting they WOULD be...

Your opinion on Douglas means nothing, as does your opinion on Peretti. You are incorrect re: the Alford Plea.

Oh the irony of your statements. You accuse Peretti of being clueless and a pawn for the prosecution, and yet you take Spitz "the boys were smashed against trees by wild dogs" nonsense as truth? The satanic angle was one component of all of this. NOT the driver. And, have you forgotten - Echols...

I didn't know Hobbs was writing a book. Agree about Peretti.

I created this thread back in 2016. It's 2019, and shockingly, they're still...what, sitting on this exculpatory evidence? Building up our suspense? Teasing us? Nope. They're hoping everyone forgot about it. Because it doesn't exist.

He gained fame and notoriety in the most despicable fashion one could ever dream up. And that is what is so incredibly horrifying. He has fans. What is "fan" short for? Fanatic. You can see it on his face when he walks into a room full of applause. His look says to me "I got away with this. I...

Supporters attempt to explain away the whiskey bottle with this gem of reasoning: there were hundreds of those same bottles scattered everywhere in that area. Of course that's completely untrue. They found THE whiskey bottle exactly where Misskelley said it was - because he threw it there...

No. THAT would be "delusional".

I presented no double talk whatsoever. I debunked your assertions. You proved your lack of knowledge and/or understanding of the evidence by making false claims. I corrected them for you. Again, the evidence against them is ubiquitous - do your own research. Read Callahan's. Read the 500. Learn...