Search results

You have absolutely no evidence or even a reason to come to that conclusion. That is nothing more than wild speculation that completely ignores the actual facts of the case. Anyone can just make up a wild story and claim that's what happened. Your farcical tale has zero bearing on the reality of...

Killers get released from prison all the time. The DA gave their reasons for accepting the deal...I understood why but did not agree with it. I wanted to see Echols get the chair. I think Echols and Baldwin are the epitome of evil. I think Misskelley is certainly a bad guy, but I think he got...

The reason there are still "non supporters" being vocal is because Echols is still out there, making money and enjoying his pseudo celebrity status - on the backs of the 3 little boys he and 2 other people murdered. He walks into rooms and receives hoots and hollers and has worshipers and fans...

He's not a suspect. There are no other suspects. The WM3 were convicted, TWICE and plead guilty. You could find a bunch of people all over the place that are scum like Hobbs...what you're failing to understand is that that means nothing in regards to this case. There's zero evidence against him...

Balwdin is a sadistic child murderer.

That's true - no new evidence...as in, no exculpatory evidence the WM3 claimed they had and would present at a re-trial. But of course -they did no such thing. Instead, they plead guilty. Their defense lawyers approached the state with the Alford Plea. Instead of showing the world the...

Your baseless opinions on Hobbs have nothing to do with the guilt of the WM3. You have, as most supporters do, completely ignored the glaring evidence that's points the the guilt of the WM3 and basically said "yeah but Hobbs!!!!" You've got nothing.

There are 2 approaches supporters take with the 500 (or 2 I've heard a lot anyway). 1. "These are just typical angsty teenage boy behaviors" (they're not) 2. "Just because someone does all these things doesn't mean they are a child killer" In other words, they downplay it or sweep it under the...

Being emphatic doesn't make one hysterical. I'm quite calm, thank you. 1. No DNA was found from anyone at the scene - supporters use this all the time and it's bunk. This isn't CSI the TV show - if you actually do a little research (besides watching crime dramas) you'd know DNA is not nearly as...

Interesting how you mention Misskelley "confessed then recanted". Which one did he recant? Confession 1? Confession 2? Confession 3? Confession 4? Confession 5? Confession 6? I've lost count how many times he confessed. Was it the ones prior to conviction? The ones post conviction? Did he have...

You are a critical thinker. Keep us posted on your findings.

Indeed - they have never released any details whatsoever about the manner of death or any abuse sustained prior to or after death of the Delphi girls. They were female and significantly older than the WM3's victims. I'm not seeing any connections whatsoever.

Supporters always attempt to disregard, deny or sweep under the rug each piece of evidence on its own, that glaringly shows their guilt - of course you can't do that - ignoring or denying these things doesn't make them untrue, and if you combine everything together, the 500, Misskelley's many...

Yes, it's a robust document. How supporters can sweep this under the rug is really a testament to their denial and/or dishonesty. This was clearly a dangerous, psychotic individual. I'm sure someone will chime in with "he was just a typical troubled teen". I am Echols' age and was a long-haired...

Have you read Echols' psych reports from before the murders yet?

It's incredibly galling to me that no interviewer has ever asked any challenging, pointed or probing questions of any of the WM3. They go in already believing the bunkum that they were "railroaded and wrongly convicted"...they walk on set to cheers and nothing but questions about how difficult...

Your gut instinct is correct. Supporters will insist that Misskelley was so mentally challenged that he was able to be coerced into confessing over and over and over again, both pre and post conviction, but all of a sudden, when it's in his best interest to be told what to do (i.e. to STOP...

"Never mind anything Misskelly said." That sums up the supporter mindset. "Ignore any and all evidence that points to their guilt, because that supports our narrative". That's a ludicrous statement.

If Jessie will "tell you anything you want to hear", how did his own attorney not get him to STOP confessing? Can't have it both ways. Utterly disingenuous, this guy.

Shocking, he's releasing his "memoirs" and working on a book. And still espousing the "mind of a 5 year old" and "mental retardation" BS. You can see it right in the "documentaries" that he's clearly NOT the mental midget supporters make him out to be. And now he's got him faking not being...