Search results

The bigger issue is, will his daughters want to have contact with him? While they are minors, the custodial parents will have the ability to prevent any and all contact. As adults, they can do as they choose, and frankly, as adolecsents if they choose to contact Brad there is little the...

The law societies of the western provinces (BC, AB, SK, MB) all have an agreement in place to allow their memebers to practice within those provinces. I'm not sure why you mention Ontario because it doesn't factor in this case, but Ontario is not a party to that agreement, though its not hard...

I strongly disagree with this statement. I could not imagine a judge in Canada ignoring a murder conviction when making a custody decision. Since you seem competent at using CANLII (an excellent resource, by the way) look up custody cases where one person has criminal convictions and you will...

The problem is you refer to them as his children. Biologically, yes, but in the eyes of the law, not at all. I'm not going to say 100% he has no chance, because there always is a chance, I suppose. But having sworn before a foreign court that he killed the children's mother? He would have no...

I'm not sure what the argument is about as I haven't been following, but, Brad is not a "parent" in the eyes of the law once he consents to an adoption. While the children are minors, frankly, even if they wanted to live with him, it wouldn't happen. As a non-parent he has no rights. Brad...

Hello everyone, I needed a day or so to decompress from an intense Monday because of Brad finally admitting to what I felt I already knew. There is healing that occurs when someone finally tells the truth about a horrific crime. I took some time to consider why this case matters to me. I...

No, not even once.

Please, try to answer the question. Why would someone Brad name a childhood friend have reason to think he killed Nancy right away?

Perhaps then you can explain to me why Brad named him as a childhood friend while in a deposition and under oath?

Yes, and as you know the ex-fiancée posted on facebook today, her first public comment ever. Among other things she posted that Brad was a sociopath based in her own experiences with him.

Do you know any of them? You don't, I'm sure of that, because I would have heard about you speaking with them... because his circle was very small. I could name two Brad supporters out the Medicine Hat/Calgary crowd, there could be more but I doubt it. So yes I wouldn't say "all", but its...

Yes I think an even better quote would have been that the girls deserve not to know him and their lives will be better because of it.

-I don't think you understood what CyberPro said. You've oversimplified the state's case to the point your information is no longer accurate. -Why set up the straw-man about the size of the space and the router? Its not like if they match you'd change your mind about Brad's guilt.

Who is they? And how would you know?

Let's start with one reason: The integrity of the system.

If Kurtz withheld the plea deal from Brad he could be in hot water with the bar. But Brad would have to initiate the complaint.

At 35 minutes in it is explained why the plea was offered: (1) the mercy of the Rentz's and (2) the trial had cost the county millions already. In other words, they would have gone forward had the Rentz's wanted it though it would have been expensive and they were OK without having to have the...

That's what he said. It doesn't change anything, it just suggests that Brad had the option of agreeing to spend an extra year in prison and not sign the adoption papers. He chose otherwise. Really, he wouldn't have any prospect of getting the children back anyway. The judge just chose to...

Who lied? Brad? He swore he killed her!

Its called mercy, something Brad didn't give to Nancy. Also the family didn't want to go through another trial, and didn't see the need to have him kept in jail until he is dead.