What made the defense pick this guy to testify as forensic examiner? This probably means they couldn't find anyone more qualified to take the case, which means the defense didn't have a good argument to start with. Raises the validity of the FBI findings bit time IMO.
Just the fact that he didn't own the software used for his examination and "borrowed" from a friend should be enough to invalidate his testimony. Who guarantees this software was legit? Also if he doesn't have a license for this software he shouldn't be using for professional purposes even...
So now that the google search established premeditation, I'd think that the evidence of buying drop cloth at Lowes the previous day has increases in significance/validity.
Funny how Kurtz accused Det Daniels of asking Brad the same question again and again and now he is asking Det Daniels the same questions again and again :D
So they are proving why and how he became a suspect? To me it's almost going backwards. At this point we were supposed to prove that he is guilty of committing murder, right?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.