Search results

Hello everyone I know that I have been gone for a long time. I am the one who suggested that Dikran may be the man that was under the mystery couple in South Carolina. If there is anything that I can help with or if you need me to pull up what information I had found the first time around I do...

What is the link for the information that states that the lady saw them at the diner with a federal agent??

I know i learned a valuable lesson. I was on my laptop when i came across it. So next time i will either look it right up on my phone and screenshot it or take a picture

Sorry my kid bumped into me Its was basically saying that they will handle the investigation and they dont need any help from the local authorities. .. paraphrasing...

Yes i saw that as well.. but no that Is not the same one. The one i originally posted said based on the informatin from a conf informant. They w

Oh i wasn't saying that I would keep it from them. What i was saying is that if they asked what i knew about the case honestly its a few puzzle pieces out of the whole thing. I know what I have heard and i have seen the warrants that is about all... I would in no way ever ever try to cause any...

I am really wanting to read the threads on evidence 1 and 2. I am also very reluctant because if I do get summoned I would honestly be able to say that I am not familiar with all the evidence. I know what is going on currently but I am no way familiar with everything that went on before the gag...

I'm not sure but since i have the link posted on here. I may email them and ask why they removed it

Thank you for that carbuff .... but why would they need to remove it and now... i mean it didn't say anything special it didnt give specific names ... ok the federal government kept a mission hush bc they were trying to track down drug smugglers that may have kidnapped them .... that was almost...

Yeah everything is there and pretty much says the same but the one that said due to information given by a confidential informant they are no longer going to be discussing details with the local authorities... and they replied back stating that theu would like at least some type of info ...

Well i am completely baffled that they removed that information... i mean what was so harmful with the statement that I saw... I mean its sends up a red flag but not that big that they wipe all history of it

As i am reading these. These are not the same as what I had previously seen. The text and the content has been changed.

Page 2

Sorry im late

I will take screenshots of them and post them around 4 or 5pm. I have to go get my kids from school

It is because of all the road construction http://m.wdam.com/wdam/pm_/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=od:ogdlHAes

Thank you tedmac and hatfield for your response. I would never go to someones private property on purpose. I also agree that the property of all parties involved will be left to LE. Also this is not something I would do alone. I would not want to go wandering through the woods alone or at...

It just seemed extremely odd that a " confidential informant" gave them something that made them go ghost about everything... IMO ... and it is her father that worked for the doj not his

Does anyone know if it would be against the law to do an independent search. I understand that they don't want to search without any solid leads.... IMO there are so many places to look. Just wondering if anyone knows