Because it was deleted by the mods. The only one showing now is his response to my response of his original post. (page 27).
I'm not trying to be snarky but what is the big deal about this statement?
She could have been but I didn't see any proof of this presented at the trial. I don't feel it was proven that Chloroform was used, but that's my opinion so I guess we can agree to disagree. I will agree however that it is very sad that we'll never really know.
I disagree. He didn't say it WAS used before applying the duct tape, he said he could only hope it was used before the tape was applied so that Caylee went peacefully without feeling. That's not the same as saying it was used. It's also not the same as saying it wasn't.
With or without the...
I didn't mean anyone in particular. It was stated that posters weren't allowed to bash the victims. I simply stated that the Anthonys have been bashed since the beginning.
??? He said "We can only hope that the chloroform was used before the tape was applied so that Caylee went peacefully without feeling". Not sure how this is different then what I said. I didn't post his whole quote as I didn't think it would be necessary but yes, he said we can only hope the...
Um, yes it was. He said and I quote: "We can only hope that the chloroform was used before the tape was applied so that Caylee went peacefully without feeling".
IMO saying that chloroform was used is the same as saying it was an accident. Neither was proven. Even Ashton couldn't say for certain that it was used. He said he could only "hope" it was. This was one of the main problem with the trial. There was nothing proving BARD that Casey ever used...
Yes I did. If you read what I wrote it was in response to IF there was an accident. I didn't say there was so you might want to go back and read the complete thread. As far as the jurors, it's pretty comical that you would say that since there have only been a few jurors who came forward and...
Thank you for your post. I agree! This is how I felt as well. I was upset about the verdict but understood how they came to it. The only part I still struggle with is the Child Abuse charge as I feel that even if it was an accident, her not calling for help was negligent BUT I don't see how...
Again, not sure how many time I have to explain this...IF this is what happened I think that after she panicked and tried calling them and when no one picked up she had a moment to let it all sink in. Maybe she was going to text them, maybe she thought about calling 911, maybe she didnt, I...
IF, and I repeat IF it was an accident I don't know why she didn't call Lee. Perhaps after the flurry of calls the reality of it all set in and she realized that they would never forgive her and this was going to ruin everything for her. So she did what Casey does best, she took the easy way...
Snipped & BBM
I never saw those calls as Casey calling for a babysitter. I always felt that the flurry of phone calls led more to the possibility that is was an accident. I always wondered if things would have been different had Cindy picked up the phone. If it was an accident I think...
ITA!!! I too believe that Casey is solely responsible for what happened to Caylee, whether it was an accident that she covered up or a murder. I just didnt feel that the SA proved that she was murdered. That doesnt mean I believe that BARD that it was an accident but without knowing either...
This post was brought over from the "Did the jury get it wrong" forum. I wanted to reply back but it appears that the forum has now been closed and we've been directed to use this one. :)
Dr.Fessel, I'm not really sure how “What you heard” relates to my post where I agreed with...
BBM. ITA! There were too many leaps to be made and in the end they should have brought all of it together. IMO if they did we would have had a different outcome. Although I think they did a good job, I think they were too confident and were swayed by the public's opinion of Casey's guilt and...
You’re the one who said that you would have been insulted by Jose being overly friendly to the jury by him saying "good morning", so yes I was asking how that's different then the judge or any other person in this trial who was overly friendly to the jury? The only difference I can see is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.