I forgot to add that CR has the other two properties he owns by himself. So the grandchildren will split that. DR didn't own any property at all so I'm not sure why anyone thought that it was DR that the probate documents would have been started with. As far as the grandchildren, the Court will...
The LM's you are referring to I guess is probably the Manleys and they have zero say in anything because DR had decedents.
DR and CR estates will be spilt 4 ways between the 4 grandchildren. I suspect that not all 4 mothers/fathers would have interest in it and some might sell or get rid of...
Ohio Law:
When appointing an administrator of the estate, Ohio law requires that the court ordinarily appoint the surviving spouse of the decedent, of if none, or if the spouse declines, the court will appoint one of the next of kin of the decedent. The administrator must be an Ohio resident...
That one is actually a good deal. I'm surprised it's been on relator.com for 600+ days. Thanks for the examples. There seem to be a few people listing on Relator.com though I don't think they have MLS nor do I care. I still think most don't. Besides this has nothing to do with anything except...
I'm not trying to argue, but that is a mobile home for sale by a company VMF Homes in Pedro Ohio -not close- that is selling the mobile home and just the mobile home. If that's all you can come up with to show an example of people in Piketon listing on MLS then I'm still sticking with my belief...
I don't really think I can post it.
Though I did just look at some pictures from 2014 and the red barn was there and I saw quite a bit of rooster huts in the picture too. Very organized in nice neat rows. That doesn't have anything to do with why I think CR bought it, but someone else was...
I doubt it was listed. I think sales are by word of mouth and I don't suspect anyone would pay a realtor to list their trailer but I could be wrong. In small communities you hear at the grocery store and gas station that so and so is selling their land or place so I don't think you will find a...
I don't think it's been assessed since 2013. It's not included on the property sketch either so it would seem to have been built after that. It still doesn't explain for the 2 acre lot next to it valued at 3k and sold for $60
Previous owners only paid $30k for it and did the additions. You can see them in property sketch however the photo provided is of 2008. It appears to me that updates were done in 2008, 2010 and 2013.
And to answer another question from the poster before you, I have not sleuthed the previous...
I'd be happy to do so.
6 acres including all additions valued at $50200
2 acre lot with tiny barn $2990
Less than $60k for the two properties combined.
Well the 2 acres that the house isn't on is not worth 60k either. There is a total of 8 acres there belonging to CR that were purchased on the same day from the same person.
What you say is very true and that's why there is a push to reform it and why it's currently before the House.
I don't think these properties were "seized" yet though. At this point, I think it's more of a chain of custody and to preserve. In the future, they very well could be held onto...
They would have a difficult time showing that the actual trailers were purchased with any money from a crime committed because I'm pretty sure at least one of them was on the land when it was deeded to them from Clarence. That huge new barn though... Definitely was an addition and an expensive...
While most of what you say is true, I cringe every time I see a Wikipedia link. They are not a reliable source or considered any authority. Anyone that wants can change what the page says and many times the pages aren't correct. I know of many examples. With that being said, here is a link for...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.