Search results

My guess is that other case is very much the exception. They have proof TC groomed her in the emails. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

There had to be a major deal if they charged him with aggravated kidnapping. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

They are calling her a teen runaway in that article. They have already said ET was kidnapped. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

What else happened on that case though? Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

The US Code for Federal Kidnapping. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1201 Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

He crossed state lines. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

I don't see how he won't. He is charged with something that carries a minimum 20 year sentence. The proof of that charge is Walmart in OKC. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

That US Code Aggravated Kidnapping is a minimum of 20 years. He will get life as a child molester. We all know what jail is like for that. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

I'm wondering if these depositions are about a lawsuit against the school. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Yes, or where the friend worked. I haven't seen anything reported about why Shoneys, what she did there or anything. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

We have no idea if she ate there. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

That I'm not sure about without looking at the documents. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

And I think he has lost that because his wife filed for divorce days ago. Unless he comes to court, she should get everything she asks for and he won't have any assets. I said the other day I wondered if the divorce right now was only to protect her. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Nope they fired him on the 14th the day after he took her. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

If there are adults on this list and their names are made public, that will be interesting. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Question. If this is to compel parents to make their minor child talk, would the order be for the child or parents? Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

One of the articles made it sound like a very long list. I don't know the legalities of it, but if parents stopped minors from talking.. Would this be an order for the minor or for the parents? Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

What ever this petition is for, even if for a civil suit, I would think the divorce proceedings would financially protect TC's wife. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Even more confusing. The local paper has an article about this petition, but it clearly mentions a civil suit against Tad. Also that this questioning is about the investigation being done by the attorney's office and the civil suit...

Yup.. Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk