I don't see how he won't. He is charged with something that carries a minimum 20 year sentence. The proof of that charge is Walmart in OKC.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
That US Code Aggravated Kidnapping is a minimum of 20 years. He will get life as a child molester. We all know what jail is like for that.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Yes, or where the friend worked. I haven't seen anything reported about why Shoneys, what she did there or anything.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
And I think he has lost that because his wife filed for divorce days ago.
Unless he comes to court, she should get everything she asks for and he won't have any assets.
I said the other day I wondered if the divorce right now was only to protect her.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Question.
If this is to compel parents to make their minor child talk, would the order be for the child or parents?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
One of the articles made it sound like a very long list. I don't know the legalities of it, but if parents stopped minors from talking..
Would this be an order for the minor or for the parents?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
What ever this petition is for, even if for a civil suit, I would think the divorce proceedings would financially protect TC's wife.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Even more confusing. The local paper has an article about this petition, but it clearly mentions a civil suit against Tad. Also that this questioning is about the investigation being done by the attorney's office and the civil suit...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.