The more I listen to the debate of what the red flags are in regards to KM and BS I am seeing two parts to their quest that might even be worth analyzing separately to form a conclusion for the joint actions of murder and then their suicide - for the sake of future prevention.
The generation...
Well we really don’t know.
I think it could have been “just left as it is” as it was playing out.
Maybe KM was tracing his roots, engrained in his family history, and that was what motivated them to head to Northern Manitoba. Maybe many family stories and years of studying family history was...
I wonder if the family did contribute info to the RCMP to aid in their investigation. If they held out that would be concerning but what can RCMP do about it?
Yeah but they had already allowed Mom to see it and KM’s family (if they chose to watch it) so the interference idea doesn’t fit. Unless of course he was considered an accomplice or involved. But then if it was a possibility about a third person involved then it shouldn’t have been shared with...
If the prints would suggest that they had tried to start the van then does it slightly alter their theory about coming back and targeting LD because they had mechanical issues or would that theory also apply to CD and LF. I feel like it’s an important part that was deserving of more explanation...
Well then “you are welcome” :)
It all sounds logical to me and I think the RCMP knew they would have to show it - they already had made the call to let Mom see it, (and had no place in making the call about the legalities regarding next of kin) but were dragging it out for various reasons...
FWIW: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/schmegelsky-mcleod-murders-video-1.5272080
“Leamon said she doesn't know if McLeod's family have also seen any portion of the video but she said that the battle to get access to the video — like every other part of the case — presented a set...
I do think he actually saw himself as ‘disposable’ and may have even been told that a time or two. So I’m suggesting it was a direct stab at the viewer it was left for and that viewer may not have been meant for dad if it was addressed only to his mother or maternal side (based on the father...
Going back to the garbage comment.. I am curious if the “final will and testament” was directed to both his parents or just his mom (could it be why the decision by police wouldn’t give access to dad?). If just his mom and he said to just toss his ashes in the garbage then I sense the disdain...
Just over 5000 people so I guess it is a city. A very very small city. I am not sure what else I had said in relation to this partial snip but I doubt it changes where I was going with it.
He didn’t have to. The police compare what they are told with what they know. He didn’t have to sell him out and he most likely wouldn’t have had any evidence to do so but he most likely did have enough to share that painted a different picture than that of the other families.
He clearly...
I’m not committed to anything based on the lack of info (for the specific observations). We just can’t draw a conclusion of what each item presented represents/means/knows with the vagueness of the single piece-by-piece detail or lack thereof. I am just too stubborn to be expected to trust that...
No but it did demonstrate the dishonesty of their trip plans between the reports they received from other family members. It was a good start. There is also the reference by AS of Airsoft so they were potentially armed and an average citizen may not be aware of whether it was a lethal weapon or...
It could be as simple as AS revealing the texts that BS says they are going to Alberta which wasn’t in line with the family saying they were off to the Yukon. AS making a statement to RCMP at 5:51 am and then the report saying they received info at 2:00 pm could be where the witness testimony...
AS did know Kam. IIRC there is a reference of conversations he had with both of them. The problem, as it came across early on was that AS was not contacted by RCMP when the boys truck was discovered, and he learned of it through the media. His interviews highlighted a lot of the “problems” with...
I guess I am reaching. I suggested this witness would “know” them if there was conclusive proof such as proof of ID. Not “knew” them as in a relationship.
This person is considered a witness as per the report. A confession doesn’t make sense if the witness did nothing wrong except come in...
I agree. We did have “friends” who came forward to share threats that BS made. I’m saying that whatever the account it would fit within the timeline, not years or months prior even. As for a random stranger being able to come forward I mean that they could be loosely described as “knowing” them...
It could be. For me the wording “knew” is as loose as “observed”, which was used to say they were “observed” at various gas stations when we know for example that at Fairview they are pumping gas so it could have said “they were observed purchasing gas”.
“Knew” could be a witness who can...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.