Search results

We have your daughter. No they didn't. The End.

Charlie Sheen...is that you??? j/k Good to have you fired up and ready for action Dave.

Holdon, there's a massive reason why nobody takes that note seriously. The entire premise of the note is that the author HAS the child. So when it is discovered that the author in fact DOESN'T have the child because she's still in the house, the focus turns to...well, WHY doesn't the author...

Good stuff Agatha. The minute people start attempting to reinterpret the Bible is the minute they should just throw the whole thing away. Either you believe it....ALL of it, or you don't. To pick and choose the bits you believe or reinterpret the Bible is like reading the dictionary and...

;) Ramseys....hahaha Ya nuffy.

It's pretty clear that if you create enough loose ends or muddy the waters on EVERY topic, that it achieves its goal.

And we were all preparing a search party too...even started our own thread. Heck, there was nearly a section for you IN Websleuths! (ignore the poor taste in my joke)

Bits removed from above quote... DeeDee, do you really think that given "they" said in their ransom letter not to talk to anyone or her remains wouldn't be returned that any "kidnapper" would risk returning to the house with a dead child and "deliver" her? This just strikes me as...

It's sort of hedging your bets. Single intruder options. - She knew the intruder, but they drugged her anyway? - She didn't know the intruder, they hid while she ate pineapple which they had drugged, then they jumped out, she screamed and they smacked her in the head? So why drug her? - She...