If she was rushing off to meet someone, the authorities must know the person in question, as text or phone call records would have evidence of the planning. Unfortunately, we don't know...
But, that would make someone else complicit in concealing the vehicle, which would increase the risk. That is, if Gail were not the one to have it repainted.
On the other hand, if it was Gail who had it repainted, that would make a bit of sense, in that she would need a vehicle to function...
2 plausible scenarios - 1. She was meeting someone, and she did not want the children to be present. 2. She was running a quick errand and felt it would be easier to do it w/o the children.
Either way, my guess is that she expected to be back in very short order.
In the technical sense, NONE of the above is evidence. There's no car, no body, no blood, etc... In fact, there is no crime scene whatsoever. Therefore, any conclusion that we put forth is purely supposition, extrapolating from the little information that we have been provided.
So, having...
Problem is, there is no concrete evidence that points to any particular scenario, EXCEPT the behavior of the Significant Other. I guess that I am back to my previous suppositions - What are the odds that either #4 or #5 happened, in the face of what is clearly (based upon evidence) a rapidly...
Could it be possible that there is an unknown 3rd party who might have wished Gail harm? I mean, a compelling reason for her bringing the children back to TN from AL within 24 hours would be that she had a prearranged appointment w/someone on 04/30/11. Whomever that someone might be could be...
Wouldn't it be ironic (and not in a good way) if Gail were in fact to have had a fatal accident somewhere, with no involvement by Matt? From his perspective, that would be like manna from heaven. He would get what he wants (freedom from marriage, custody of both children, all marital money...
So, do you think that the vehicle (w/Gail) is off the mountain, but someone brought the phone back to the mountain? What would be the purpose of that? Wouldn't it make more sense to dump the phone off the mountain, if someone wanted everyone to believe that Gail had run off?
So the car's not on the mountain, but the phone never left it? I would be willing to place a bet that the car is on the mountain somewhere, whether in a garage, shed, lake, etc...
ATRUEFRIEND, are you able to tell us whether Gail was a 'lone ranger' kind of a person or one where she let others have a bit more influence over her actions? I ask this because I am the type of person where my stubborness would likely prevent me from ever running away from a situation. I just...
For anyone who knew this little guy in life, it would have been obvious that it was him in the CGI photo. I mean, look @ the 2 curls on his forehead. They're exactly the same in all his photos.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.