Search results

No, what I'm saying is it has to be a small part of an overall investigation, not the fulcrum on which the entire case hangs or doesn't hang. But sadly the public are not too savvy where DNA is involved, so "DNA was present" implies an almost automatic conviction, and "DNA was not present"...

PS - if you work in some form of management at a waste collection company - let's face it - you KNOW if you charge by weight or by collection, since you will be charged by the landfill by weight of what you dump there - <modsnip>

I posted my thoughts on forensics somewhere earlier on probably another thread that has since been closed down in order to open a new thread, but in essence the Police in the UK now suffer from a major shortage of detectives - you have detectives working on 20 cases simultaneously, which has...

You'd imagine so, so that the LF site can charge the appropriate amount - that is why I STILL think there is more to this than meets the eye. Let's hope it meets the eyes of the Police - they appear to be blind to even the obvious facts.

Listen, my background is in electronics and actually in measurements of tiny signals where calibration is essential, and I actually spoke to CM's mum and told her, and told her, and told her all of the reasons why the recorded bin weight should NOT be taken as gospel, and that it was probably...

So what? That's still not PTCOJ, just not doing your job properly, and it would still be the bin man himself who woould have been asked by the Police "did you check the bins?" If he said yes - he'd be the one for the high jump. If he said "no" then they'd have had the reality from the horses...

I suppose that one explanation for his phone cutting out / stopping working would be if it went into a river along with CM. I think it would be possible for him to hit the water at Barton Mills and end up at Kings Lynn, even if this body isn't his - his could have gone out to sea.

But then the PTCOJ charge would be against the person who should have carried out the check and said they had, not an office bound dispatcher who would have been at home in bed when it all happened. How is he to know if bins are searched or not?

Harold Shipman was a respected doctor in the community he worked in, which is why people found it hard to believe he'd murdered 200+ of his patients. You can't go on things like that, status, job, etc - in some ways a person intent on committing certain crimes might be drawn to a partcular line...

<modsnip> what happened is that the papers named the "bin driver" and then had to retract it and apologise and remove all online content because they had given and photgraphed the wrong guy. My question was how did they get his name as the driver who covers that particular route?

I think the implication is that fraud A was being perpetrated and was "under the radar", so when the Police came around sniffing at crime B, what they were presented with was aimed at covering fraud A, which had a knock on effect into the investigation of crime B. This then becomes a case of...

I suspect they checked the number plates and since they didn't think there would be multiple people involved in the cover up they didn't check vin numbers / chassi numbers - or the CCTV didn't catch the number plate - haveyou seen some of the mugshots of people - no definition of even a face...

Nor would you think they could search a loft 5 times and miss the body of Tia Sharpe who was there all along - but they still did

To me it shows the folly of forensics - not saying they're a bad thing per se, but you'll all have seen the recent stories in the news in the UK of officers resigning because they are too stretched to do their jobs properly. So, the Police officers at the coal face, some of whom (detectives)...

Hello, this is exactly what I was just going to post. I've said all along that he MUST have been in the cab of the bin lorry for the phone signal to be able to ping the mast/s. But the Police found no forensic evidence of Corrie being in the truck. This guy was arrested for perverting the...

I'm sure it's been mentioned already but the recording is one of those really odd ones that your brain can interpret in many ways. When I first heard it - as a British person - I was 100% certain that it was a Scottish accent saying "down there". When I saw that the Police thought he was...

I honestly think the world has gone stark staring mad. Nicola is banging on about the amazing work that MIS have done collating all of the facebook and twitter posts from the find Corrie stuff into a spreadsheet so that they can be searched by keyword. What the flip do they think that is going...

"Perverting the course of justice is an offence committed when a person prevents justice from being served on him/herself or on another party." So it suggests someone hiding evidence / giving false or misleading statements to avoid justice being served. I suppose it could be someone who is not...

Well it hasn't lead to her killer being caught so it looks like poppycock to me. Irrespective of that, the carpet is real, and the rock is real, so maybe showing those real things might illicit some clues, rather than trying for imaginery "scientific" breakthroughs. I imagine that if this was...

I'm sorry but this is nonsense - I am an elecronics engineer - see this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zi4kXgDBFhw And the Police results cannot be "inconclusive" - either the signal can or cannot get out - it's like saying dropping an apple and seeing if it goes up or down in inconclusive -...