Search results

It makes absolutely no sense that someone has to go on ancestry.com to look up WM in 2008, when had he googled that name in 2008 he would have been able to find him.

I agree - and why post what looks like a potential crime, opening yourself up for exposure to those who aren't pleased their faces/trucks are now on the net.

does anybody else have the feeling that this case is essentially "solved", and LE is just going about their business collecting evidence, etc.?

nah, it's some kind of fleur de lis which makes sense if they were outside Ottawa the drivers may be from Quebec. could be anything associated with Quebec

Maybe that's the only place he got in. Maybe they wanted to emphasize French. And maybe he took the subway.

So then maybe you're right. Maybe he's guilty and is staying silent because he doesn't have an alibi, doesn't have evidence to prove it didn't do it, etc. Now what? It's not like we can just skip right to sentencing.

I wonder if they froze his assets?

One thing is for sure. After the link to missing LB, the coke selling to her, the purchase of the condo for cash the day after, etc. it will be hard for DM lawyer to make grand statements that he is a confused, "good, well behaved" boy who is totally shocked that he is in this predicament.

The description may have been from what he wore when picking up TB. Not from the first test drive. First test drive he may well have worn short sleeves.

That doesn't surprise me. In a 6 unit building each occupant has their own phone. Cell phones, most likely. Why would a single land line be assigned to this address?

But if they're right and approximately 5 people are involved: 2 driving, 2-3 following, then that seems like a LOT of people all convinced that murder is "ok" via video games or bad moral compasses. Isn't it more likely that the moral compass was off when it comes to stealing a truck than when...

Exactly - they are three years behind in filing annual filings. BUT they updated the website info in the last week. If this is in fact true, it is potentially relevant activity.

Maybe his identity needs to be protected as the only possible eye witness to the pair.

I liked this idea. Until I thought that if it were me who had witnessed something, the last thing I'd do is place the truck up for sale on the internet that I had with me during the particular event, and then go and take a ride with two strangers on a test drive in said truck.

I liked this idea. Until I thought that if it were me who had witnessed something, the last thing I'd do is place the truck up for sale on the internet that I had with me during the particular event, and then go and take a ride with two strangers on a test drive in said truck.

Why would they need to publish how, specifically, he was identified? We don't know for sure that the only thing linking them is the phone. The police did say, though, that "the phone led us to him". There is obviously more detail that we aren't being told, which is the evidence needed for the case.

a link about what?

maybe they found a ring or other items that were identified.

I'm confused: why do people think that AM is the other suspect?? If it is him, don't you think that he would have been identified by the man who was already approached for the first test drive??