Search results

You guys have to stop taking tiny slices and leaving out all the context. You've quoted the smallest piece that gives the impression you want, and leave out the entirety of the rest which contradicts what you claimed. In the same testimony you will find that she says the bones were different...

Destroyed him by claiming the document was signed by another person? Surely you must be kidding. None of his testimony was contradicted or refuted. All we got was more of the same when it comes to Avery's defense(s). Misdirection. Still not exculpatory. These were desperate attempts to have...

People on the internet question it. Avery doesn't. Dassey doesn't. In fact, they both swear it happened. Their defense teams don't claim it didn't happen. I never once said no one but Steven failed to mention it.

All good. I thought that was probably what you meant, but thought it was possible that I had missed something. Yes, Bryan said that. It's obvious Bryan thought that. Bobby has been consistent in that as well. It's he said/he said. But based upon all the other factors, which I have...

You do realize that simply saying it was coerced does not mean it was coerced. Nor does it mean that even though that he WAS led into that part of his confession, that none of what he said was true, nor that that parts where he WASN"T led were false. Nor does any of that mean that the bullet...

Her bones weren't found in 3 places. They were found in 2. Avery's burnpit. And one of the Dassey burn barrels nearby. The quarry was nothing but misdirection. No bones that were found there were ever determined to have even been human at all, or at all related to this case.

Then again, there were multiple tires. And animal bones scattered about as well. Seems human bodies weren't the only things burning there, nor were carcasses being burned a rarity. They were hunters. There were hunting camps nearby as well. Logic dictates that? Does logic dictate that they...

Why would that bullet need to have entered her skull? It had her DNA on it. Not bone. It would need to have been flesh or blood, or other bodily fluid or tissue. That's right. 22 would not produce a large wounds, which she didn't have. Nor a large spatter to clean up. Oddly enough, they...

Right. Mass inception to make everyone including the defendants, their family, their attorneys and neighbors believe there had been a big(now little) burnpit fire so they could plant bones in the burnpit. I'm sure the defense wouldn't actually consider having all, or even one say so? Rather...

Makes no difference? Of course it does. A huge fire and a fire in a burn barrel won't burn items to the same degree. The burnpit fire was long, it was large and it lasted until who knows until what time, as Avery was seen standing out by it after 11pm that night. It had many tires...

The above is total nonsense, and unbacked by any actual facts. You'll notice. The blood was shown to be impossible to come from an active bleeder. Care to explain how? Or are simply riding on one of the many changing, unsubstantiated theories presented by Zellner? There were both drips and...

The palm pilot was in the burn barrel Avery was seen putting things in, and that was seen burning that day. Not the burnpit. The body was not cremated, nor would it take in inordinate amount of time to burn it to the extent it was. 6-8 hours as described as by Zellner's own expert. And that was...

Right. Except for the parts where he claimed over and over again his mother came by with his mail, or where he stayed home specifically to make calls, when none were made, or that his brother and friend could vouch for him because they were there, only to claim(12 years after) that they weren't...

Of course, you won't be able to show any actual evidence he was framed, or anything more than innuendo and conjecture, but something tells me that won't mean anything. The idea that somehow you almost 100% convinced he was framed, but cannot actually point to anything that proves that leads me...

Lol. What? Let's have a look at Avery's contributions, shall we? Again, even though he was claiming he was already being framed, and that evidence was being planted against him(even though, at that time it could have been anyone, as no evidence had yet linked him to the crime personally) he...

Yet, it wasn't inconclusive due to the reasons outlined for you. An inconclusive test would not have been certified by the lab itself, nor admissible in court. It seems you really just want it thrown out because you don't want to believe Avery committed the crime. The realities here are quite...

It was found in Avery's burn barrel. AS was her camera, and her Palm Pilot/ personal organizer.

We are in agreement with this. Although it isn't nearly as cut and dry as the cops lied to Brendan and he changed his tune. He was lying from the start of the investigation, and during his interviews. There is a reason his story has also changed so much.

Lying during an investigation isn't cooperating. I can;t see how it can be interpreted as such. Particularly when someone is already claiming that evidence is being planted, and seemingly knowing where they would plant it, and where they wouldn't.

Or he had no choice. Were you aware that after the rav-4 was found, he had intended to run away, but was talked out of it by his father because it would make him look guilty? If he runs away, he has no chance of collecting his lawsuit money. The forces working against him were investigating a...