Search results

"no sign of deception or unwillingness to cooperate" ? Aside from the series of lies that his accounts would have led one to believe? Why are you ignoring that he lied repeatedly? That everything he claimed to do that day was false, and that what he was actually doing was directly related to...

It's definitely subjective. In fact, many disciplines people think are irrefutable would be surprised. The term "reasonable degree of scientific certainty" sounds great and wonderful, until it is explored a little more. I am under no illusions that experts can be mistaken. But their testimony...

Can't follow the link. You're talking about a fire that no one questions. Not even the defense, the defendants themselves, nor the numerous attorneys who rep them. It has become fodder for internet conspiracy theories. No one had connected the fire to the crime until after the remains were...

Again, the negative control is a blank run through used to calibrate the machine. There is supposed to be no DNA in it. It is supposed to provide a baseline. Culhane introduced her own dna into it. It was sloppy work, for sure. But it had no impact on the results or testability of the actual...

Come on. This is getting just a bit extreme, no? His own words destroy his credibility. Avery was claiming he was being framed before any evidence had even been found linking him to the crime. It's in news videos. He changes his stories- who knows how many times. He is convicted, tries to...

Demonstrated? All you've done is allude to a rainbow of different reasons, a series of unconnected, and completely unsupported claims, brought by numerous defense teams, based entirely on innuendo and conjecture, while ignoring all the actual evidence. There is a reason none of these claims...

What are you quoting from Blaine's affidavit? That he said B0bby said he saw her walk to Avery's trailer, showered then left?

According to Bryan, Bobby told him that he saw Teresa leave. Bobby has never said that. It coukd be a case of one or the other being wrong. But based on Bobby’s consistent account, and all the evidence that supports what he said, I see no reason to doubt his account. Bobby said he left and went...

Lol. He lied. NONE of the things he claimed he was doing then were true. That is certainly a curious means of “cooperating.” He had already accused police of planting evidence against him. He was “cooperating” because he was trying to get away with murder. Which is why he lied about shat...

Again, Avery changed his tune *this year* on that. He now says they didn’t come that day, but another day. Avery is the one who is now saying it didn’t happen. Think about that. Having *already* made statements that evidence was being planted to frame him, in desperate need of an alibi, he...

No bone is required. No skin cells. No blood. As none of that was or could be tested for at the time, all we can day is that the bullet came into contact with Teresa Halbach. 12 years later we have an expert who said he saw microscopic particles of wood, a waxy substance and microscopic red...

Cooperative? Are you kidding? Someone who continuously and consistently lied, by definition, is not cooperating. He was trying to give the appearance of cooperating. Again, you are make a judgement without considering the contexts. Please read up on the dna testing process. Sure, there is...

No, I’m saying only Avery lied when he changed his story again a dozen years later. The story the other 2 told hasn’t. Avery continues to contradict himself and others, and for some reason people keep belieiving his new versions of things as they come. What are you talking about with an...

At the time it was examined, no one rported finding anything of note. It wasnt examined for microscopic particles. There is nothing that would indicate the bullet struck wood when fired. It is a claim made by a defense attorney unsupported by testimony or subject to cross examination. A claim...

I think they did. As they said. As Avery said, when being investigated for murder. He has since changed his story. Now he says it was the week prior. That is the point. He keeps changing his story, over and over and over to try and meet the demands lf explaining the same facts that have never...

Can’t disagree about the reliability of the lab. But the odds of 2 contaminations in one case is astounding. Let alone 2 contaminations on one test. Let aline 2 contaminations in 2 separate samples. Let alone contaminating a sample with the very dna of the person who’s murder is being...

The knowledge we have now? What knowledge states that that there was no blood on the bullet fragment? WhT you seem to be doing is substituting claims by Avery’s attorneys as evidence. They aren’t. Zellner has repeatedly misled in her filings. Those red drops could be almost anything...

Iirc, Teresa left the message at 2:12. She said she was in the area and *looking for their house*. Over the next 15 mins she finds the house, takes pics and is on her way to Avery’s as she said in a call, to arrive there sometime between 2:35-2:40. This is supported by all the evidence, the...

That is a leap, regardless. There is no real mechanism that would explain how her dna in a negative control would somehow translate into Teresa Halbach’s in a separate test sample. If you haven’t, I think you should read how the process unfolds. Unless you think she deliberately contaminated...

Yet there is literally no evidence than a will to come up with alternate interpretations for all the evidence that points to one outcome. Most telling is that the very person you are citing in one instance saying it MAY have been as late as 3pm also said on several occasions that it may have...