Search results

@proudfootz (proudfeet!) I mean, like any science, it isn’t exact, can be misinterpreted and abused. Nonetheless, a ballistics expert, someone certified as an expert in the application determined that the bullet was fired from that one particular firearm, to the exclusion of all other...

(Whoops)

Other than the victim’s DNA on the bullet that matched that rifle, a statement that it was used in the murder? That the victim was never seen or heard from again? That her vehicle with her blood was found? With his blood in it? That her bones were found burned behind his garage in a place he had...

I read exactly what she said. What you have done is leave out the entire context that was provided by everything else she said. Look up the rest of her testimony. I’m trying to give you a clearer picture based on further info. You provided one statement which ambiguously supports what you are...

Well, I’d just say millions of other people felt the same way after Making a Murderer. Such is the effect of a dishonest presentation. Anyone could have out those things in the barrel? But not Avery? I don’t get that. Consider the full context and weight of the ohysical evidemce that support...

What?? How is that she was going somewhere else..... but not Avery’s when she specifically said she was in the area of the Zipperer housr at 2:15, and on her way to Avery’s at 2:27? Really, again, how much beneift of the doubt can you give Avery? Just have a look at the direct testimony of Mrs...

That's right, but it was in Avery's possession. It hung on a gunrack above his bed in his bedroom. Correct, there were no prints and no DNA recovered from the rifle.

Someone else accessed Avery's rifle? How much benefit of the doubt can this guy be given? No one's fingerprints were on the rifle. Or DNA. The computer you are talking about isn't just Bobby Dassey's. It was used by the entire family. More bait and switch by Zellner. That *advertiser censored* could...

The bullet with Teresa’s dna was determined by a ballistics expert to come from that exact rifle. Avery’s rifle. So, yes. Of course, it too was left out of Making a Murderer. The 2nd known wound was also to the skull. I must admit I find it odd that you say you do not trust Bobby Dassey, but...

No, it really is. Teresa called the Zipperer answering machine at 2:12pm and said she was in the area and looking for the house. She spoke to her coworker at 2:27 and said she was on her way to Avery Salvage. Bobby Dassey states that he saw her arrive sometime around 2:35-2:40. For what it’s...

Not sure what you are saying about the bullet fragments. They found 2 bulleft fragments in that garage. One was matched to Avery’s rifle, and had the victim’s DNA on it. Zellner is claiming the state claimed that bullet caused one of the bullet wounds on the victim, but they never did. So by...

My point is that with touch DNA, the last person to handle an item is often the only DNA recovered. It was actually testified to at trial. The bullet passing through her body does not require it to have passed through bone. Zellner used the bait and switch on that. Not only is not necessary...

To add(not sure how to do so to the other posting).... What motive would anyone else have to murder Teresa Halbach that is auto-scrubbed from Avery? He had shown her unwanted attention, had called to book appointments with her consistently and increasingly after his girlfriend was jailed. He...

The only parts of the skeleton that were missing were destroyed by fire. The forensic pathologist testified at trial that they found fragments of virtually every bone in the body scattered in that burnpit and the nearby burn barrel. Her body would have been placed in the back of the vehicle...

Avery took quite a few measures so that the victim was not aware he was the customer that day. He blocked his caller ID, called in the appointment with a callback number he could not have received a call on... for the first time, mind you. The victim had voiced her concerns about Avery to...

There is a tremendous disparity between everything KZ has said in his case, and what she has done or shown. She’s now tqevmerely hoping for a Brady violation based on the contents of internet searches that have no relation to the crime.

No, it really doesn’t. It’s been denied over and over again. His attorney is desperately trying to have anything stick, and nothing is. Her motions have been denied over and over. Sorry, not sure what you mean. What makes no sense? That everything points to Avery’s guilt?

No, it really doesn’t. It’s been denied over and over again. His attorney is desperately trying to have anything stick, and nothing is. Her motions have been denied over and over.

Had something to do with the events of that night. Whether or not he raped her or was a participant in her murder, or of he told the truth at any point is another matter. His role is much less clear than Avery’s.

Absolutely guilty. There are simply too many factors that point directly to his guilt that could not have been provided by others.