She only read the instruction and rejected Nurmi's stipulations that she tell them it's a personal choice. The part about sticking to your guns if you believe it is part of the instruction.
I doubt that. They ask those questions to gauge the person's feelings on how they feel about the legal process overall. For instance if a potential juror had a family member who killed someone when they were younger tbeyd want to know about that as feelings are not likely to change just because...
But she did not disclose the violent crime he was prosecute for, apparently, only the non violent burglary. At that time Juan was prosecuting homicides so it would reasonably never cross his or anyone's mind that he prosecuted a burglary in the mid 2000s when he was not prosecuting those kinds...
Yes MCSO is investigating. They have said only six copies of the names were given to legal people and that the list appears to have been copied from one of the lists based on how it's written and the fact it includes middle names.
I think that Michael guy needs to eat crow. It was Juan who held the jury in the palm of his hand, not Nurmi. He would have gotten the death penalty if not for the stealth.
Yes. It was wrong for someone to leak all 11 names of the death voters to the Jodi supporter website. The holdout was only found out because her husband was posting on SM and outed his wife as the holdout.
It's one thing to hold an opinion. I think most of us could respect her decision if she...
Right now, since I know nothing will happen to 17, I'm much more interested in what they find regarding the leaked names on the JAII site, especially since the only people who had that info were legal people. It had to be a member of the defense team. The site has been obtaining this kind of...
No she means she and everyone else knew about the juror's ex-husband's legal problems but she did not know he was prosecuted by Juan. Her statement is passive aggressive though. The defense likes to blame everything on Juan. It takes the onus off the juror to be honest and gives Willmott one...
Yes he is. And if he'd known of his connection to her he no doubt would. I don't think these kinds of extensive background checks are a part of the selection process. Willmott knows this. He's not the DT, asking for their SM accounts so he can monitor the jury and make sure they are honest. It's...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.